-
Message Boards
Movie Soundtracks
? for PETER K. (Page 29)Archive of old forum. No more postings.
Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.
This topic is 53 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53Author
Topic: ? for PETER K.
ActionGuy
Member
your right chris, I guess I dont know anything about zimmer except a small little tidbit: *deep breath*German born Hans Zimmer is a pioneer in the use of digital synthesizers, advanced computer technology, electronic keyboards and their successful integration with the traditional orchestra in music for film and television. Moving to London, Hans began composing jingles for "Air Edel Associates" and teamed up with Trevor Horn and Geoff Downes as "The Buggles" to produce the worldwide hit, Video Killed the Radio Star and subsequent album The Age of Plastic. By 1980 Hans was pioneering the use of computers live on stage while working with the group Ultravox. Then he enjoyed a period of stardom in Italy with the avant garde band "Krisma", before returning to London to develop his next project with Warren Cann of Ultravox, culminating in a series of unique concerts at the London Planetarium. It was shortly after this that Hans met and began working with the film composer Stanely Myers. Realizing the importance of incorporating the two musical forms, electronic and classical, they set up "Lillie Yard Studio" in London with the very latest state of the art musical technology.Zimmer continued to work out of "Lille Yard Studio" as his partnership with Myers strengthened. They worked very successfully on Jerzy Skolimovshi's Moonlighting, Success Is The Best Revenge and The Lightship; Nicholas Roeg's Insignificance and The Castaway. They then went on the compose the music for the box office hit My Beautiful Launderette (Best Picture Evening Standard Awards).
to be continued....
ActionGuy
NP - I know what you did last summerposted 10-02-2000 09:18 PM PT (US) DjC
Member
I wonder...what exactly is laughter. Why do we find things funny? What exactly is laughter? Hmm Hmm Hmm Pondering the thought...Hmm Dunno
posted 10-02-2000 11:51 PM PT (US) DjC
Member
I do respect the Olympics for they are in fact the OLYMPICS, but too many things are out of wack. It seems as if they have a mat, a field and the judges say "Okay, whoever wants to do something go ahead and do it, we will score it from 7 to 9.9"-N/P- Anything besides Mission to Mars
Radiohead songs actually from new CD KID A, great songs, many thematic elements.[Message edited by DjC on 10-03-2000]
posted 10-02-2000 11:58 PM PT (US) John Dunham
Member
No vacations? Sorry, Peter, I leave on friday! And I won't be back until next tuesday!
AND I intend to catch up AND post in this thread when I get back!NP: Crickets in various corners of the room
posted 10-03-2000 03:55 AM PT (US) Chris Kinsinger
Member
Laughter is medicine for the heart (Proverbs 17:22); take as many doses as you can each and every day!
If you run out and need the prescription filled...CALL ME!posted 10-03-2000 10:08 AM PT (US) Cenzo
Member
Did I miss something?hmmm...what's going on?
posted 10-03-2000 03:50 PM PT (US) Observer
Member
quote:
Originally posted by Cenzo:
Did I miss something?hmmm...what's going on?
Nothing. It's a, *ahem*, "MADHOUSE, A MAAAAAAADHOUSE!"
posted 10-03-2000 05:21 PM PT (US) DjC
Member
I wonder....I AM VERY VERY EXCITED TO WATCH THE...........DDDDDDDEEEEEEEEBBBBBBBAAAAAAATTTTTEEESSSS = DEBATES!Gore needs to lie about his past since he is a criminal and a lier, Bush Needs to tear Gore " A THIRD CORNSHOOT!"
posted 10-03-2000 05:23 PM PT (US) Wedge
Member
Poor, poor DjC ... why, you've got it BACKWARDS!THAT'S what'll drive this board into the next millenium! POLITICS!
posted 10-03-2000 05:36 PM PT (US) DjC
Member
Well, it has been debated now...Bush did very well, Gore was kinda let down. I really thought Bush did way better in many issues, but it some issues it was close. Over all I think Bush gets the piece of cake.
posted 10-03-2000 07:38 PM PT (US) PeterK
FishChip
Looks to me Bush got the whole cake.Gore has some practicing to do before the next debates. Perhaps a little less condescension?
posted 10-03-2000 07:49 PM PT (US) Chris Kinsinger
Member
PeterK...I didn't even watch tonight's debate, and I could've told you going in that Gore's biggest fault is his inherent SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS.
He rolls and squints his eyes in utter DISBELIEF that ANY views but his own should even be considered!
He consistently poses as if HE and HE ALONE knows the Secret of walking on water...POMPOSITY INCARNATE!
If this man wins the White House for the next four years, I shall not view a news broadcast during that entire time. I've seen quite enough of this horrendous behavior among men in the Church...I cannot stomach it in the White House.
posted 10-03-2000 09:05 PM PT (US) Wedge
Member
I'll disagree on Bush's "acheivements." In terms of rhetoric, I think they both pretty much held their own. BUT, I found it curious that when Gore kept bringing up the fact that half the money benefits the richest 5% of the population, and that under Bush's plan more money goes to the richest 1% than social security, medicare, education and defense COMBINED, Bush brushed it aside as "fuzzy math" but NEVER DENIED OR ADDRESSED THE FIGURES! Not once! Every time Gore brought up specifics (which was frequently,) Bush avoided the issue, or started talking about something that wasn't really relavent. I would have liked to see both candidates spend more addressing the others' criticisms, and less time repeating themselves.
posted 10-03-2000 09:06 PM PT (US) Chris Kinsinger
Member
Wedge, the "Democratic Myth" for decades has been that Republicans are for the RICH, and they (the Dems) are for the PEOPLE!
Gore keeps repeating and repeating this myth because it has been so successful in the past.
The TRUTH about "The RICH" people in the United States is that THEY are the ones who consistently pay WAY MORE TAXES than anyone else!
And if somebody GETS TOO RICH...like Bill Gates...WATCH OUT! Just take a look at what the Clinton administration has tried to do to Bill Gates!
Here is a man who began his American Dream in his garage, and built it into a gargantuan empire! Because of his fierce ingenuity, MILLIONS of Americans are employed today!
But Clinton/Gore/Reno did everything they could to BRING HIM DOWN!
WHY?
Because he refused to play their game.GOD BLESS BILL GATES! And anyone else who has the ability to be such an incredible blessing to so many other people!
The Clinton (and AL GORE) administration should be ashamed of this debacle!
I don't even have to mention the lurid scandals (ALL of which Gore kept SILENT about for 8 years!) to discredit this administration.
NEXT UP: Gore's visit to the Buddhist Temple. "No Controlling Legal Authority..."
posted 10-03-2000 09:31 PM PT (US) Wedge
Member
Sorry, Chris, but while I don't agree with Gore on every issue (partial-birth abortions, et al) I think his economic/ foreign policy/ environmental/ education (ESPECIALLY education!) agendas are much more logical and efficient than those of the opposition.As for Bush, I wouldn't trust him to run for Chinese food!
But honestly, all these politics confuse me so ... "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's ..." I make a bigger difference in my church, school and family in one day than I ever will in a ballot booth for the rest of my life, and THAT'S God's honest truth!
posted 10-03-2000 09:51 PM PT (US) DjC
Member
Here is a quote from GORE........" I repeat, I did not have personal relations with that Buhdda(speeling)"
posted 10-03-2000 10:00 PM PT (US) Observer
Member
Chris, are you favoring a flat tax? Say someone instills a flat tax, that, for the sake of argument, is $3. The guy working at minimum wage loses about half his money while someone like Bill Gates who, lets say has a billion dollars (I think that's how much he has), will barely loses even 1%.As for Gates "Playing Clinton's Game" he's not on trial for not paying taxes, but for "preditary business tactics and monopolizing the computer industry" if I remember correctly. Clinton, I don't think, is even part of the Anti-Trust trial.
And what's worse: Thomas Jefferson having sex with one of his slaves or Clinton having an affair?
Discuss.
posted 10-03-2000 10:03 PM PT (US) Observer
Member
Did Bush really win?
posted 10-03-2000 10:06 PM PT (US) Chris Kinsinger
Member
"Chris, are you favoring a flat tax? Say someone instills a flat tax, that, for the sake of argument, is $3. The guy working at minimum wage loses about half his money while
someone like Bill Gates who, lets say has a billion dollars (I think that's how much he has), will barely loses even 1%."That's not how a FLAT TAX works.
Every person pays THE SAME percentage.I am indeed in FAVOR of a FLAT TAX, where every worker pays THE VERY SAME PERCENTAGE!
If you earn $100.00 a week, you pay $16.00.
If you earn $1000.00 a week, you pay $160.00.
If you earn $10,000.00 a week, you pay $1600.00.
If you earn $100,000.00 a week, you pay $16,000.00.THAT's WHAT I CALL FAIR TAXATION!
You'll have to explain to me what is wrong about that!
posted 10-03-2000 10:18 PM PT (US) Chris Kinsinger
Member
Wedge, I wonder if you watched PBS' FRONTLINE last Monday night?
Even this incredibly liberal venue profiled Gore (utilizing interviews with those who know him) as a "chronic liar"! They spent an amazing amount of time with one of his long-time pals who said, "He will say whatever he needs to say to get elected."Wedge, I cannot tell you that I am a George W. Bush FANBOY...I hardly know anything about him, thanks to our PATHETIC press.
But I WILL tell you that Al Gore has already PROVEN that he will LIE to you & I whenever he needs to.I choose to vote AGAINST such a man.
It is a sad state of affairs for me to go to the polls voting AGAINST someone, rather than FOR someone.
Sad indeed.
That's the way it is.
posted 10-03-2000 10:28 PM PT (US) Observer
Member
What do you think of this?
http://www.wordwiz72.com/flattax.html
posted 10-03-2000 10:31 PM PT (US) John Dunham
Member
I think I'll vote for Dave Barry.
posted 10-04-2000 03:40 AM PT (US) Chris Kinsinger
Member
Observer, you said:
"And what's worse: Thomas Jefferson having sex with one of his slaves or Clinton having
an affair?"Both are wrong.
I don't care about the sex.
I DO care about our government spending a year dealing with the mess because the President didn't have the integrity to simply tell the truth. I believe our nation is filled with very forgiving people who would have been well ready to forgive the man from the beginning if he had simply told the truth. Again and again and again he lied to his family, his closest associates, he lied under oath, and finally, to you and to me. And because of it, the entire nation was caught up in the mess for a whole year.
To my knowledge, Thomas Jefferson didn't do any of that.posted 10-04-2000 10:41 AM PT (US) Jack
Member
Observer: Pop Quiz: Who is Juanita Broarddrick?Bonus question: What did the convicted Maria Hsia and the convicted John Huang have in common?
posted 10-04-2000 02:29 PM PT (US) DjC
Member
Chris is right, DO NOT BRING UP THAT CLINTON HAD AN AFFAIR! WE DO NOT CARE! We care about the man LYING to everyone alive and in the process breaking laws and screwing the courts........NOT to mention CHina, Security, illegal fundraising, murder,the list goes on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on, CLinton is a shmuck.
posted 10-04-2000 03:55 PM PT (US) Observer
Member
Chris: Forgive my shoddy memory, but what was the whole trial about in the first place? If I remember correctly, it was about Clinton having an affair with another woman. The fact that he lied about it made an insignificant problem into a worse situation. But if it wasn't about sex, then why were people constantly chiding him about the affair?DjC: Murder?
Jack: They don't ring a bell. This is going to bite me in my ass, isn't it?
Wedge is right: Politics are the adrenaline to the thread!
posted 10-04-2000 06:08 PM PT (US) Probable
Member
Politics are good for that, yes. So are controversial issues. On that note...I think euthanasia is the only moral option in some cases, and that abortion should be the prospective mother's choice, not society's. Also, I eat meat. Moreover, I know exactly what's in hotdogs and still enjoy them. I also hated Survivor.
hee
posted 10-04-2000 06:20 PM PT (US) Chris Kinsinger
Member
"Pop Quiz: Who is Juanita Broarddrick?"The married lady who testified that President Clinton tried to rape her in the White House.
He bit her lip, as I recall, and she was bleeding. The White House did everything possible to destroy her credibility."Bonus question: What did the convicted Maria Hsia and the convicted John Huang have in common?"
Their buddy Bubba.
Observer, my memory is probably shoddier than yours, especially as it pertains to the lurid details of our current President's extramarital life. All that I can recall is that Paula Jones brought a lawsuit against Clinton charging sexual harrassment, and that led to the discovery of his affair with Monica Lewinsky. Clinton sent his dirty dog "Ragin' Cajun" Carville out to sit on all of the TV news talk shows and destroy Paula Jones' credibility, but it didn't work, and she was ultimately awarded $750,000.00. By that time the Lewinsky thing was about to hit the news, and Clinton sent one of his personal attornies out to call Linda Tripp a liar. Linda read that in print and decided to provide a little proof in order to clear her name. She secretly taped many hours of Monica talking "All About Bill", and sent the tapes to the authorities...howz that?
posted 10-04-2000 08:15 PM PT (US) Marian Schedenig
Member
I'm not American (what else is new?), but with all of this talk about politics, I just have to add 2 cents:- Clinton lied. That's certainly not a good thing at all, but I don't think it's as disgusting as most say, considering the situation: As you said above, it's Clinton's own decision with whom he has sex. If YOU were (rightfully) accused of having a sexual relationship besides your marriage, and a whole nation is greedy to know more about it, would you easily admit it? Again, I don't say it was right for him to lie, but the whole issue of making it such a public sensation was disgusting to begin with.
- WhatEVER the other issues, how can anybody vote for a man who consciously KILLS people to become more popular? Regardless of what you think about capital punishment (I'm STRICLTLY against it), Bush obviously speeds these cases up. I once saw an official Texan homepage where you could read the exact dates of past and future executions, along with pictures and detailed information. It was shocking.
NP: Die Hard 2 (Michael Kamen)
posted 10-05-2000 09:21 AM PT (US) Mark Olivarez
Member
Since we are on the subject of politics my sister sent me this today:> Vice President Al Gore is using all his influence with President
> > Clinton to persuade him to tap into the nation's emergency oil
> > stockpile.
> >
> > He argues that this is the right thing to do to combat
> > decade-high oil prices.
> >
> > "Today, there are families ... all across the country who are
> > wondering how they are going to be able to pay for heat this
> > winter," Gore said. "We have to change that."
> >
> > Gore wants to put on the market some of the nearly 600 million
> > barrels of crude oil known as the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
> >
> > To truly understand how corrupt Gore's pandering on this issue
> > is, you need a little history.
> >
> > In 1922, Edward L. Doheny and Harry Sinclair bribed Albert Fall,
> > the secretary of the interior in the Warren G. Harding
> > administration, for secret leases to drill on two oil-rich fields
> > held by the U.S. Navy as emergency reserves in the event of war
> > or serious disruption of supplies. One of those fields was called
> > Elk Hills in Bakersfield, Calif. The other, just outside of Caspar,
> > Wyo., was called Teapot Dome.
> >
> > Sound familiar? Of course. When the bribes were discovered, the
> > ensuing Teapot Dome scandal forced the resignations of Fall,
> > who later went to prison, and Edward Denby, the secretary of
> > the Navy.
> >
> > In 1973, during the gasoline crisis, President Richard Nixon tried
> > to lease Elk Hills to increase domestic oil production. Congress
> > stopped the deal.
> >
> > In 1984, 1986 and 1987, the Reagan administration proposed
> > selling Elk Hills for $1.5 billion to reduce the deficit. Congress,
> > again, blocked the efforts.
> >
> > Now, hold onto your hats. In 1996, as part of Gore's "reinventing
> > government" package, he recommended that Elk Hills be sold.
> > Clinton approved the plan. The deal was included in the 1996
> > defense authorization bill that Congress approved.
> >
> > Guess who wound up buying Elk Hills for $3.65 billion. You
> > guessed it. Occidental Petroleum, which tripled its U.S. oil and
> > natural gas reserves in the process.
> >
> > Who is Occidental? This is a company that has provided major
> > campaign funds for Gore and the Democratic Party. But it is
> > much more than that.
> >
> > The founder of Occidental is Armand Hammer who had, in his
> > own words, Albert Gore Sr., "in his back pocket." When the
> > current vice president's father left the U.S. Senate in 1970,
> > Hammer, a primary sponsor of the Communist party USA and a
> > personal friend of V.I. Lenin and Josef Stalin, provided him with
> > a $500,000-a-year job and a seat on Occidental's board. But
> > Gore had been on Hammer's payroll throughout most of his
> > political career.
> >
> > When the younger Gore was elected to Congress, the
> > sweetheart deals with Hammer and Occidental continued. Gore
> > receives $20,000 a year from Occidental as payoff for mineral
> > rights on his farm. The zinc mine on his land, by the way, makes
> > him one of the biggest polluters in the state.
> >
> > According to the Center for Public Integrity, Occidental gave
> > $50,000 to the Clinton-Gore re-election effort in response to
> > one of Gore's "no-controlling-legal-authority" phone calls from
> > his office in the White House. Occidental has given more than
> > $470,000 in soft money to various Democratic committees and
> > causes since 1992.
> >
> > Conflict of interest? I think that term would be the
> > understatement of the century with regard to Gore's political
> > posturing about greed and avarice on the part of oil companies.
> > He owes his political patronage to an oil company with one of
> > the shadiest histories -- one that built its fortune on bribery,
> > including the bribery of Gore and his father before him.
> >
> > There's even more to this story than I can relate here. I've
> > recounted some of the details in previous columns. (See links
> > below.) Another excellent summary is provided by the Center for
> > Public Integrity.
> >
> > I didn't think it was possible America could ever elect a
> > president more corrupt, more tainted, more compromised and
> > more self-serving than Bill Clinton. Yet, judging from the polls, it
> > is still entirely possible that could happen in November. That's
> > right, I'm beginning to think that Al Gore is even more of a
> > walking scandal, more of a double-dealing hypocrite and more of
> > a danger to the future of America than his predecessor.
> >
> > Gore camouflages his thievery and personal privilege better than
> > any politician I have ever seen. And I had thought I'd seen the
> > once-in-a-lifetime master in Clinton.
> >
> > Now, Gore, once again, has a compassionate plan to help you
> > and me by selling off the nation's strategic oil reserves.
> > Personally, I have no problem with the federal government
> > getting out of the oil business altogether. But I sure don't want
> > to see Gore and his sponsors benefiting from the deal. If history
> > is any indicator, you can rest assured there's a payoff here.
>
I would be interested to know what you think of this.posted 10-05-2000 09:46 AM PT (US) Chris Kinsinger
Member
Mark, all of that information is in the public domain, but you'll never hear our liberal media touch it! However if we had been talking about a Republican doing all of that, the press would be all over him like a cheap suit!Marian...let's talk about lies...
There are lies, and then there are lies. Every single one of them has a price tag attached to it. Some of those price tags are larger than others.
Let's take, for instance, the lie of an ordinary man who has cheated on his wife. He lies to her about it to protect his own hide. That is the second lie; the first lie occurred when he did the cheating. When the truth is discovered (as it usually is), she realizes that she has been betrayed. Both of them pay a price for these lies. It is possible that this couple will stay together, but trust has been broken, and it takes many years for that break to mend.
Now let's take that same ordinary man and put him in the position of the CEO of a corporation. The cheating took place with another employee in his office during working hours. He hasn't just lied to his wife, now he has lied to all of his fellow managers and employees. When the truth is discovered (as it usually is), this man has a larger price to pay than his marriage. He is also likely to lose his job.
Once again we take this same man, only now he is the President of the United States. You know the scenario already, only now he has taken that lie into a Federal court room to illegally stop a lawsuit against him. When the truth is discovered (as it usually is), he not only has lied to everyone surrounding him, PLUS lying to his entire nation and the world at large, he has also committed perjury which is a felony in the USA. A sitting President guilty of a felonious activity instantly sets into motion another legally binding activity; that of the House of Representatives. There is no way to stop this Constitutional machine when you set it into motion. It is an awful process that ties up the US Government for months and months, costing millions of taxpayer dollars to resolve. Now every taxpayer in the entire country has paid the price for this "little lie".
A President, or anyone in public office with even a shred of personal integrity would choose to resign rather than force the nation he serves to go through such a costly ordeal. That's what Richard Nixon did. So did Bob Packwood. So did Newt Gingrich. However, William Clinton forced all of us to wade through that cesspool with him for a year. Why? Why does any "ordinary man" lie about cheating on his wife? To save his own hide.
Does that help to explain anything for you?posted 10-05-2000 11:37 AM PT (US) Marian Schedenig
Member
Chris, certainly. That's not what I meant. It's just that I kind of understand that he did lie. That doesn't make it right. But for me, if any married president has sex with another woman, that has nothing whatsoever to do with his function as a president. It's one thing to admit this as a private person, and a completely differnet thing to admit it in public to millions of people, whose business it isn't, at least not in my eyes. Again, this doesn't make it right, but the whole situation makes it much more difficult to admit the truth.NP: Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (Churchill/Harline/Morey/Smith)
posted 10-05-2000 02:45 PM PT (US) Chris Kinsinger
Member
"...the whole situation makes it much more difficult to admit the truth."That would depend upon the man, and how familiar he happens to be with the truth.
posted 10-05-2000 04:14 PM PT (US) JJH
Member
you know Marian, I as a mere Teaching Assistant in teh Political Science Department at Texas Tech University, couldn't get a blow job from a student, lest I get fired IMMEDIATELY.
that the President of the US gets away scott-free is utterly disgusting to me.
On the other hand, I'm all for the death penalty. None of this understanding the rage, or compassion bullshit. As the murderer deprived someone of their God-granted life, so should the murderer be deprived of his life.
You choose to do certain actions, you choose to live or die by the consequences of those actions. period.posted 10-05-2000 05:00 PM PT (US) Mark Olivarez
Member
quote:
Originally posted by JJH:
you know Marian, I as a mere Teaching Assistant in teh Political Science Department at Texas Tech University, couldn't get a blow job from a student, lest I get fired IMMEDIATELY.
that the President of the US gets away scott-free is utterly disgusting to me.
On the other hand, I'm all for the death penalty. None of this understanding the rage, or compassion bullshit. As the murderer deprived someone of their God-granted life, so should the murderer be deprived of his life.
You choose to do certain actions, you choose to live or die by the consequences of those actions. period.You said it, I agree 100%. About the death penalty that is.
posted 10-05-2000 05:03 PM PT (US) John Dunham
Member
You know... there is biblical support for the death penalty, sort of.Genesis 9:6
"Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed; for God made man in his own image."What do you all think? Does that qualify?
NP: Jumanji Suite
posted 10-05-2000 07:30 PM PT (US) Wedge
Member
That quote from Genesis may indeed be just, and was the law under Moses. God doesn't have a problem with this system. But he did qualify it ... "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone ..."
posted 10-05-2000 07:50 PM PT (US) Chris Kinsinger
Member
The sad, TRAGIC truth about our society is that there exist in it certain individuals who NEED to be EXTERMINATED.
Ted Bundy was one example that I know of.
HOW MANY young women did he violently rape and murder?
I cannot recall!
I do know that the final known total of lives that he extinguished was well over TWENTY.
All of them were young women who he torturously raped before murdering.
Bundy went about this ghoulish activity for several years before something in his near-dead conscience directed him to move to Florida, where he instinctively KNEW that when his crimes were discovered he would definitely receive the Death Penalty!
His final recorded interview before his execution in Florida is a VERY INFORMATIVE document to hear!
It is available on cassette tape from Focus On The Family (Telephone 1-800-AFAMILY).
Marian, before you cement those anti death penalty views into your young mind for an entire lifetime, I CHALLENGE you to hear all of this interview!
posted 10-05-2000 09:17 PM PT (US) John Dunham
Member
Wedge: Yes, that's true, He did. But it could be argued that that was in reference to that particular situation; the woman wasn't guilty of murder. On the other hand, it could be applied to everything; Jesus did say to reject the law of Moses, which also included "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth."I don't really favor the death penalty, but I'm not against it either. That's the problem with being able to see both sides of an issue.
Well... I'm off on vacation now! See you all in four days. (Hey, run a couple more pages in this thread while I'm gone, will you? I'll be able to do a whole page of replies. )
posted 10-06-2000 04:04 AM PT (US) Scott
Member
quote:
Originally posted by Observer:
And what's worse: Thomas Jefferson having sex with one of his slaves or Clinton having an affair?Discuss.
This alleged affair has still not been proven. I have read an interview of the doctor or scientist who did the DNA testing. He said that he told reporters and the like that "the probability is very high that Jefferson did have the affair and was the father, but there is still a substantial margin of error and uncertaincy".
We of course know that Clinton actually did have his little Calicula moment.
Pretty bad if a teacher (as myself) would get immediately fired if I had such an encounter in my office with my secratry, but the President gets away with it just because everyone's pocketbooks are filled with money. Sad, sad, sad.
Hmmm, first time I am responding to this thread. Now I have to take the weekend to read the whole thing.
Scott
Scottposted 10-06-2000 02:04 PM PT (US) Old Infopop Software by UBB