The MovieMusic Store shopping cart   |  sign in
    SEARCH  
  • Home
  • Browse Store
    • New Soundtrack CDs
    • Top Sellers
    • Low Price New CDs
    • Used CDs
    • Soundtrack Compilations
    • Score Composers
    • Soundtrack Labels
    • Soundtracks by Year
    • ... detailed search page
  • Store Info
    • Happy Customers!
    • $1 Shipping
    • Accepted Payment Methods
    • Safe Shopping Guarantee
    • Shipping Rates & Policies
    • Our Privacy Policy
    • About Us
  • Help Center
    • My Account
    • How to Order
    • Search Tips
    • Return/Refund Policy
    • Cancelling Your Order
    • Contact the Store
  • The Lobby
  •   Message Boards
      Movie Soundtracks
      Star Wars vs. LOTR

    Archive of old forum. No more postings.

    Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.

    Author
    Topic:   Star Wars vs. LOTR

     Spicy Ramen
     Click Here to Email Spicy Ramen
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    Strictly comparing Star Wars and Empire Strikes back to Fellowship of the Rings and the Two Towers, which is a more cohesive listening experience? Let the arguments begin.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-14-2003 07:57 PM PT (US)     

     Lancelot
     Click Here to Email Lancelot
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    Let the arguement end right here by not beginning!

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-14-2003 08:11 PM PT (US)     

     rkeaveney
     Click Here to Email rkeaveney
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    Thank you, Lancelot.

    What's the use in comparing apples and oranges?

    Ryan

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-14-2003 08:35 PM PT (US)     

     Spicy Ramen
     Click Here to Email Spicy Ramen
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    *cries*

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-14-2003 10:02 PM PT (US)     

     Camillu
     Click Here to Email Camillu
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    *hands him a dummy*

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-15-2003 06:29 AM PT (US)     

     Dinko
     Click Here to Email Dinko
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    :shrug:

    Personally, I never caught onto LOTR. I like my scores busy and multilayered like late-Romantic classical music. So far, LOTR is mostly not, while Star Wars mostly is. Hence part of my attraction for SW.
    SW reminds me of an epic symphony, while LOTR makes me think of a film score. Almost by definition, symphonies are more cohesive than film music which is cut up in short cues or rapidly changes in mood because it is intended to fit a scene, not make an extended listening experience. That is not the way many see LOTR, but that is how I perceive it. As a result, SW seems to me to make more sense as a stand-alone piece of music.
    I find SW's themes to be more different from one another than LOTR's, making SW more diversified and less boring.
    For those reasons, I find Star Wars 4, 5 & 6 more cohesive and satisfying as a listening experience that LOTR.
    I'm not sure I would apply the same criteria to SW Episodes 1 & 2 which I find just as monotone as LOTR.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-15-2003 06:37 AM PT (US)     

     Kevin
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by rkeaveney:
    What's the use in comparing apples and oranges?

    Because we can. And just like those to fruits, some people like both, while some like neither.

    And with your high-handed attitude, you made someone cry.

    Bastard. (And not in the Shaun Rutherford way either).

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-15-2003 07:46 AM PT (US)     

     JJH
     Click Here to Email JJH
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    how's this:

    which will be considered the best franchise?


    Friday
    LOTR
    SW
    American Pie

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-15-2003 11:11 AM PT (US)     

     Spicy Ramen
     Click Here to Email Spicy Ramen
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    It's perfectly normal to compare apples and oranges IMHO . Both franchises have defined the composers career. Honestly, which one of you hadn't thought of William's trilogy when you heard the FOTR.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-15-2003 11:45 AM PT (US)     

     Hector J. Guzman
     Click Here to Email Hector J. Guzman
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    You´re right. I like oranges for my O.J. Now, for the pie apple is better

    I agree with Dinko.


    NP. The Pink Panther (Mancini)

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-15-2003 12:09 PM PT (US)     

     1helluvamusicfan
     Click Here to Email 1helluvamusicfan
     OscarŽ Nominee
     

    I love Star Wars and I love John Williams.. For me there is nothing or no one better. However, I really like LOTR and I am liking Shore more and more. I guess I would have to say Star Wars just because I grew up with it and the sound of Williams.

    Thanks,
    Chris

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-16-2003 09:03 AM PT (US)     

     PeterK
     Click Here to Email PeterK
     FishChip
     

    Spicy, why don't you compare LOTR and Star Wars first, then see what people think?

    It's always easier to ask "who farted?" in public than it is to fart really loud in public.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-16-2003 09:07 AM PT (US)     

     Marian Schedenig
     Click Here to Email Marian Schedenig
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Dinko:
    I find SW's themes to be more different from one another than LOTR's, making SW more diversified and less boring.

    I agree about more diversified. Also, Williams considerably expanded his style between the various installments, e.g. introducing dissonance in the ESB score.

    However, this is exactly why I consider LOTR the more cohesive work. Or to put it differently: The first three Star Wars scores, like the movies they were written for, form a trilogy. The LOTR scores, like the movies they're written for, are called a trilogy, but are in reality one big work in three parts.

    NP: The Mists of Avalon (Lee Holdridge)

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-16-2003 09:57 AM PT (US)     

     JJH
     Click Here to Email JJH
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    LOTR is more cohesive because Shoe knew going in that there would be 3 movies.

    John Williams, in 1977, had no idea that there would even be one sequel, much less 4 more movies (of varying quality).

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-16-2003 10:16 AM PT (US)     

     JoeInSanDiego
     Click Here to Email JoeInSanDiego
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    I, for one, never thought of Star Wars while listening and watching LOTR. They are so completely different...and JJH is correct, LOTR IS much more cohesive because Shore knew going in that it was going to be one, long, nine-twelve hour film.

    NP - Signs (Howard)

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-16-2003 11:53 AM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     OscarŽ Nominee
     

    On the comparison of comparisons... out of respect, let's bring Jerry Goldsmith's Star Trek efforts to the table. Truly his 5 scores for that series (just ignore film quality for a moment, which I suppose you have to if you're comparing a Lucas creation to LOTR) are as epic and textured as Williams' and Shore's efforts for their own series.

    I think one of the reasons why I've come to appreciate Shore's scores for the two films more than Williams original trilogy is that Shore comes across as a musical anthropologist, carefully researching the texts and cultural archives of Middle Earth as the intellectual basis for his scores. It adds so much to your appreciation of the Argonath scene in FOTR if you realise that not only does the "history of the ring theme" suggest the danger of Boromir's temptation, but also the same temptation of Isildur, whose flawed magnificence is commemorated in those statues. Then there's the choral lead-up to the statement of the ring theme - the choir is singing lyrics that recall the words of Elendil as he came up the River Anduin with his two sons (to whom the statues are dedicated): "This land I claim for my descendants." The presence of the Aragorn and Boromir on those boats and the dispute of Gondor's kingship heavily underpins this choice of music. (And you can see that more clearly in the FOTR EE where the immediately preceding scene has Boromir and Aragorn arguing about the strength of men.)

    For me film music often stands alone. But something is missed if you ignore the primary purpose - to support a visual narrative. Obviously the text book examples of this are William's Empire Strikes Back and Goldsmith's Star Trek The Motion Picture. But in the end the stories of those films had nothing of the richness of Tolkien's universe. That implies of course that Williams and Goldsmith never had the extraordinary opportunity Shore has had: to musically realise Tolkien's infinitessimally specified cultural landscape. And simply because there are more ideas behind Shore's music, I find Shore's 2 scores more interesting. (Of course, to make a final judgement I'd have to hear both scores in their unabridged entirety. May the day come soon!)

    On a final note, I love Williams' new Star Wars scores. I think what he has done has a parallel with Shore's approach to Tolkien. He has considered the old Star Wars trilogy a realised universe, including musically, and gone back to build up a new opus that exploits the same tonal and thematic foundations. With the exception of Across the Stars, he has drawn on the 20th century Russian masters (Shostakovitch, Khatchaturian, Profokiev) in much the same way that the original trilogy was borne out of the romantics (Wagner) and their musical benefactors (Holst).

    Anyway, it's a fruitful topic, this apples and oranges business.

    NP - A compilation of the more romantic John Barry themes for James Bond films plus the Specialist.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-16-2003 03:47 PM PT (US)     

     Spicy Ramen
     Click Here to Email Spicy Ramen
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by franz_conrad:

    I think one of the reasons why I've come to appreciate Shore's scores for the two films more than Williams original trilogy is that Shore comes across as a musical anthropologist, carefully researching the texts and cultural archives of Middle Earth as the intellectual basis for his scores. It adds so much to your appreciation of the Argonath scene in FOTR if you realise that not only does the "history of the ring theme" suggest the danger of Boromir's temptation, but also the same temptation of Isildur, whose flawed magnificence is commemorated in those statues. Then there's the choral lead-up to the statement of the ring theme - the choir is singing lyrics that recall the words of Elendil as he came up the River Anduin with his two sons (to whom the statues are dedicated): "This land I claim for my descendants." The presence of the Aragorn and Boromir on those boats and the dispute of Gondor's kingship heavily underpins this choice of music. (And you can see that more clearly in the FOTR EE where the immediately preceding scene has Boromir and Aragorn arguing about the strength of men.)



    This is a excellent analysis. One of the reasons that I find a comparison between Star Wars and LOTR interesting is because of the different history each has getting onto the big screen. You mentioned that Shore was a "musical anthropologist", which is very true, because he read the text countless times and also studied the Tolkein language.

    Shore had massive resources on his hand but also great pressure. Countless million of Tolkein fans were about to see their favorite characters and settings depicted onscreen. For all his research into the origins of the music, Shore did a near-perfect job in translating in to the big screen, without sounding contrite or downright cliched.

    Williams meanwhile worked as the film was being shot, Lucas sending him bits and pieces of the film. A $10 million production, there was not much to be spared in terms of production. Thereby, Williams dealing with a relatively new niche of science fiction had a chance to experiment with a different synthesis and sound.



    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-16-2003 07:23 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     OscarŽ Nominee
     

    I agree very much with what you're saying. In some respects, I also view Williams as a kind of anthropologist with his more recent Star Wars scores, where the source material is his music for the original film. The journeys of the characters from films 1 to 4 in the Star Wars series are underscored (no pun intended) with the development of the themes in film 1 to the themes in film 4. There's no better textbook case of this than the marvelously layered Anakin's theme, which transforms into none other than the Imperial theme. But there are other cases, think for example of the links between the 7-note conflict theme in Attack of the Clones and the Boba Fett music in ESB. How far is the Droid March from the militaristic empire music. And while I've never been able to detect the link, there is something about Across the Stars that makes me think of the Luke/Leia theme in ROTJ, and one need not explain the obvious narrative connection there. (I must admit, the last point is drawing a bit of long bow.)

    I sometimes think of the original trilogy as musical anthropolgy in a different sense. There you have more classic tales of heroism, once upon a time in a galaxy far far away, with very basic archetypes dominating the cast. (Consider the link with Campbell's thousand faced hero.) Accordingly, the Wagnerian style was adopted, and this is significant. Think of those Germanic operas - they are centered on the same types of stories (probably why Hitler liked them so much but that's another tale). The Wagnerian style was a very credible musical choice when Williams set out the underscore the exploits of the similarly mythical original Star Wars trilogy.

    And in a way this opens the more recent Star Wars scores up to a similar analysis. They are, at their heart, more realistic stories, even if they are poorly written and acted. Things such as taxes start wars, and are exploited by evil men with agendas who don't realise they are being exploited by other evil men with deeper agendas who don't realise. The stuff of (tragically-unrealised) Shakespearian drama. Instead of fate-driven victory, it is pre-ordained defeat. Suddenly Wagnerian heroics aren't so appropriate for this kind of universe, be it a long time ago or not. The sombre complexity of 20th century Russian masters becomes a far superior choice. And it turns out this is what Williams did - since the underrated Nixon he had been developing himself in that style, moving closer to Shostakovitch. And that style reaches its peak in AI (what a musical masterwork is that score!) and Attack of the Clones.

    Back to Shore, and away from anthropology. Where will he go next? Or for that matter, where will Williams go next? Each have one more score to go before their respective Ring cycles are complete. I can't guess where Williams will go next - AOTC was (pleasantly) the opposite of what I expected the score to be. But then again, so was the film (unpleasantly).

    What will be the dominant sound of ROTK? Doubtless we will hear some variant of the history of the ring motif for Denethor and the decline of Gondor, but what will be the southern kingdom's equivalent to the hardinger-driven theme for Rohan? My guess is that as Aragorn is crowned king, we will hear a triumphant version of that theme for horns that plays when Aragorn and Boromir discussing the future of Gondor in Caras Galadhon in FOTR EE. (May it be, I would love to hear those two minutes of music developed.)

    And what can we expect to hear for Frodo's descent? Where will the plethora of Gollum motifs develop next? What about a romantic motif for Eowyn and Faramir.

    I generally expect that for the most part the music of the ROTK will not be new, but will close the trilogy by bringing all the principal motifs (except the now-defunct Isengard motif) back to the fore.

    Anyway, hope that gives you more to think about.

    NP - U2POP (I'm serious)

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-16-2003 07:51 PM PT (US)     

     Lancelot
     Click Here to Email Lancelot
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    I think it is an unwritten duty of all film composers to be "musical anthropologists", of a sort.


    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-16-2003 09:46 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     OscarŽ Nominee
     

    Well, I agree with you Lancelot, but I think the whole idea of building the music up from some foundation, is just intrinsic to the process. You need to get inspiration from somewhere - I find it hard to believe that if I were one of these guys I would describe my job as 'penning tunes' or something like that. You'd impute a lot more thought to the music than any outsider might conceivably notice, unless they spent an extraordinary amount of time thinking about it.


    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-17-2003 12:19 AM PT (US)     

     Lancelot
     Click Here to Email Lancelot
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    Well, I didn't say that all music has to be approached from a anthropological basis, per se. Certainly every artist brings their own cache of experience to the project, but the broader the experience, the more opportunity for enriching the score.

    Worth bringing up from time to time is a favorite quote of mine from composer John Scott:

    quote:
    Film music encompasses every kind of music so far conceived: from ancient Chinese to rock and roll, from baroque to avant-garde/ This is because it serves a medium which expresses all things known to man. The film composer has to have a comprehensive knowledge of all tpes of music, and this seems to have contributed to the scorn heaped upon him or her in the past by so-called 'serious' music critics. Despite this lack of appreciation, the genree has always attracted some of the finest composers, and it will certainly continue to do so.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-17-2003 08:05 AM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     OscarŽ Nominee
     

    That is an interesting remark from Scott.

    I'm curious though, Lancelot, and indeed anyone else whose listening, where do you think Williams will go next with Star Wars? Assuming Lucas doesn't score the final chapter of the new trilogy with second generation tracked music from The Phantom Menace and AOTC, what will we hear when the final OST of Star Wars comes our way?

    It's not inconceivable that Williams could draw it all together without a single new motif, given his library of materials for this series. But if he were to introduce a new theme, what would it be for?

    Are we likely to hear more of Across the Stars and the Conflict theme from AOTC, or will the neglected Anakin's theme and Duel of the Fates return to the center? Or maybe Williams might dust off some more motifs from the original trilogy to complement the Empire march and the Force theme...?

    It's all idle speculation of course (considering we know hardly anything about the film), but as you might have judged from some of my earlier remarks, I'm not averse to a bit of idle speculation every now and then.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-18-2003 01:45 AM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     OscarŽ Nominee
     

    Just to add as a reply to Lancelot's quotation of Scott - I was watching the usual slew of Biblical epics that litter the TV program on this day of days, and I couldn't help but thinking that Alex North, Miklosz Rosza and Tiomkin must be among the finest of twentieth century composers. They were fine composers, but they really did their homework - doubtless all have heard the story of how Rosza did a year's preparation for Quo Vadis (or was it Ben Hur?) And that anecdote alone reminds me of the stories Howard Shore tells of the extent of his research into all things Tolkien.

    Incidentally, I remember I really felt film score fans had lost out when Shore was chosen for Jackson's adaptation. I remember thinking - this is the guy who did The Game, a great score to be sure, but how would disturbing jazz with a hint of Lygeti work at the inn of the Prancing Pony? My hopes were that he would be replaced by Elliot Goldenthal or Wojciech Kilar, and still I wonder what might have resulted from either's participation. But Shore proved me very wrong.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-18-2003 01:55 AM PT (US)     

     JJH
     Click Here to Email JJH
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    by the way, U2 Pop album is awesome.
    One need not be ashamed to listen to it.

    MOFO is a hell of a track.


    NP -- Above and Beyond, Friedhofer...about as far from MOFO as one can get

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-18-2003 08:50 AM PT (US)     

     joan hue
     Click Here to Email joan hue
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    Lancelot, I love that quotation from Scott. So true. An “excellent” film composer needs
    to know how to score music from all historical eras and from genres like science fiction,
    romance, mystery, horror, western, etc. It is their versatility that makes them great.

    Franz, welcome to our board. I’ve enjoyed your posts. You seem to be a new member
    with an amazing, intelligent voice and insightful knowledge. Hoping you’ll share where
    you are from and what are some of your favorite filmscores and composers.

    NP To Kill a Mockingbird

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-18-2003 09:43 AM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     OscarŽ Nominee
     

    To joan_hue, I am new to the column, not as a reader, but as a poster. I mostly just read the posts for news about film music which is unsurprisingly hard to come by here in Australia. (My location would probably explain why I seem to be making remarks at curious hours of the morning, American time.) Glad to know you find what I had to say of interest, and hopefully I'll have more to say on other topics in the future. It really took a debate as topical as Star Wars vs. LOTR to get me out of my shell this time, but having betrayed my intense interest in film music I suppose I probably can't very well shut up now.

    NP - A really strange CD actually that I found this morning for a ridiculously cheap price (even for ridiculously cheap Australian currency!) called John Barry. It has 25 tracks and was put out by TKO records in 1996. Coverage is mostly 1960s although not all the films associated with the music are indicated.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-19-2003 12:09 AM PT (US)     

     Lancelot
     Click Here to Email Lancelot
     OscarŽ Winner
     

    So tell us why (if not for the obvious reason) Badelt's "Ned Kelly" is only available in Austrailia, and is it worth importing?

    Thanks--and welcome.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-19-2003 07:36 AM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     OscarŽ Nominee
     

    Ned Kelly, eh? There're no stereotypes about Australians floating around around this message board are there?

    Honestly, I haven't bought it, and I haven't seen the film. But I did listen to it in store, and from what I heard its far more romantic than either The Time Machine or K19. (I haven't heard the Recruit yet, and Invincible and The Pledge didn't make their way to these shores.) I really liked the track Light - it reminded me of this Stravinsky-like theme from The Thin Red Line that never made it onto the album release - it was derived from the choral music in that film. Light is nice and there's a hint of celtic in it, which is unsurprising given the subject of the film. I can't speak for much else on the CD, there was some action music that didn't remind me particularly of anything in Badelt's other two scores. There's another strong piece called Father, which is more emotional material.

    I wish I could say it was worth importing or not, but I don't know what it costs for you to import, and neither have I heard enough of it. For those who live in the UK, my guess is HMV might carry it. Eventually the film might get an international release, and you'll find it locally then. I assure you they will need to give the film an American release eventually, because it hasn't hit off with the local population, and they spent a lot of money on it.

    My turn: who can tell me if the Hero soundtrack is any good? I've been very eager to hear this one. While we're on the topic, Mychael Danna's score for Regeneration, is it worth what would probably be $15 US?

    NP: Solaris (Martinez)

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-20-2003 02:32 AM PT (US)     
     

    Old Infopop Software by UBB

    © 1998-2011, The MovieMusic Company