The MovieMusic Store shopping cart   |  sign in
    SEARCH  
  • Home
  • Browse Store
    • New Soundtrack CDs
    • Top Sellers
    • Low Price New CDs
    • Used CDs
    • Soundtrack Compilations
    • Score Composers
    • Soundtrack Labels
    • Soundtracks by Year
    • ... detailed search page
  • Store Info
    • Happy Customers!
    • $1 Shipping
    • Accepted Payment Methods
    • Safe Shopping Guarantee
    • Shipping Rates & Policies
    • Our Privacy Policy
    • About Us
  • Help Center
    • My Account
    • How to Order
    • Search Tips
    • Return/Refund Policy
    • Cancelling Your Order
    • Contact the Store
  • The Lobby
  •   Message Boards
      Movie Soundtracks
      For KOTCS, Williams can't recapture old glory

    Archive of old forum. No more postings.

    Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.

    Author
    Topic:   For KOTCS, Williams can't recapture old glory

     Big Owl
     Standard Userer
     

    Up until the early nineties, John Williams used to write a plethora of themes for a given film, any of which could've been worthy the main theme for its own film. Since then, either his interest or his ability to write memorable themes has waned (with rare exceptions like the Harry Potter theme), and, as a result, much of his other writing has suffered as well.

    Much of what made John Williams' writing so interesting a few short decades ago was the ease with which he incorporated and integrated his themes and setpiece melodies into a fluid whole. Rather than sounding jumpy, frentic, and breathless like many of cues do now, his writing was buoyant. It could be furiously intense, but it took the time to breathe, and his action cues managed to maintain an almost balletic grace even amid all the blaring brass and thundering timpani. It helped that his pieces tended to be powered by strong themes and even melodies seemingly made up on the spot for the particular scene.

    None of that thematic virtuosity or melodic spontaneity is in evidence with KOTCS. The action writing careens from one stock action lick to another without the seamless melodic throughline that is the hallmark of Golden Age Williams. Even in 'The Jungle Chase', where a number of themes get their most rousing renditions, it seems that Williams is trying to cram as many notes into each measure, each line, each phrase as possible. Sometimes less is more, and John Williams seems to have forgotten that.

    [Message edited by Big Owl on 05-15-2008]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-15-2008 09:32 AM PT (US)     

     Jeron
     Click Here to Email Jeron
     Standard Userer
     

    Ouchie.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-15-2008 10:33 AM PT (US)     

     sean
     Click Here to Email sean
     Standard Userer
     

    Disagree.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-15-2008 11:14 AM PT (US)     

     budharney
     Standard Userer
     

    Big Owl, I want you to know that you have ruined this score for everyone.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-15-2008 11:48 AM PT (US)     

     PeterK
     Click Here to Email PeterK
     FishChip
     

    Hasn't ruined it for me! My interest remains the same. One man's opinion is just that.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-15-2008 12:04 PM PT (US)     

     sean
     Click Here to Email sean
     Standard Userer
     

    bud, if it's any consolation Big Owl is way-off, IMO. This is a great, fun score.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-15-2008 12:08 PM PT (US)     

     Crono/Kyp
     Click Here to Email Crono/Kyp
     Standard Userer
     

    Represent Sean.

    And for sure...it's wicked fun!

    [Message edited by Crono/Kyp on 05-15-2008]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-15-2008 12:23 PM PT (US)     

     SpoilerOrange
     Standard Userer
     

    Big Owl, how's your memory? If you're going to criticize JW for not writing a memorable theme I just want to be sure you have a stellar memory. It would seem grossly unfair if it was just your memory that was digressing.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-15-2008 01:21 PM PT (US)     

     Crono/Kyp
     Click Here to Email Crono/Kyp
     Standard Userer
     

    Throwback!

    Totally frakin' throwback! I love it!

    --Brian

    [Message edited by Crono/Kyp on 05-15-2008]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-15-2008 02:15 PM PT (US)     

     Adoy
     Click Here to Email Adoy
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by PeterK:
    Hasn't ruined it for me! My interest remains the same. One man's opinion is just that.

    Agreed 100%!


    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-15-2008 03:17 PM PT (US)     

     John C Winfrey
     Click Here to Email John C Winfrey
     Standard Userer
     

    Same here, Peter. You said that well. I still look forward to the film and the score. Will judge it on my own. Thanks, J.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-15-2008 05:50 PM PT (US)     

     gkgyver
     Click Here to Email gkgyver
     Standard Userer
     

    Anyone who expected Williams travelling back in time to the 80s, writing the score in this past mindset and bringing it back to record in the present should be shot in the first place.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-15-2008 05:59 PM PT (US)     

     rolltide1017
     Non-Standard Userer
     

    100% disagree. Is it as good as ROTLA or TOD, not IMO but, I think it is much better the Last Crusade. I think this is the first time Williams has come close to re-capturing his glory days in a long time. I just hope this isn't a one time trip to the past because I'd like to here Williams write like this more often. Best Williams score since Jurassic Park and third best in the Indy series IMO.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-15-2008 08:12 PM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    I going to agree with everyone, so far. Of course it's a fun score, it's John Williams doing Indy after all these years (that sounds naughty)!; but, this is by far the WORST Indy score. The action cues are very boring (similar to his early Harry Potter music) and I just haven't been in to this one. Granted, I've kind of fallen off of the Williams' bandwagon with my own personal tastes, so take this limited review with some water and call me morning if any side effects occur.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-16-2008 12:06 AM PT (US)     

     Quill
     Standard Userer
     

    Well...I have not heard it yet, sad to say.

    But, I will agree with the original poster that JW has done little to impress me in the last five years tied to fresh material (save for a few cues from ROTS.) I retain high hopes for Crystal Skull though.

    The sound clips I have heard do not inspire...but it is impossible to judge from 30-seconds. I'll do my best to avoid critizing the holy grail of moviemusic.com...John Williams.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-16-2008 05:35 AM PT (US)     

     BigT1981
     Click Here to Email BigT1981
     Standard Userer
     

    Some people are just never happy with the recent output of Williams, I think the score is good. Bad form "Big Owl".

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-16-2008 11:03 AM PT (US)     

     SpoilerOrange
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Quill:
    The sound clips I have heard do not inspire...

    Are ya serious? You're basing an opinion on sound clips?

    If you never saw the film nor heard the entire score do you really think you'd be "inspired" by randomly selected 30 second chunks of RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK?

    Ya, right.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-16-2008 11:35 AM PT (US)     

     Crono/Kyp
     Click Here to Email Crono/Kyp
     Standard Userer
     

    Everyone needs to see the movie. Right now we're all basing thoughts on music alone. Filmmusic usually, not all the time, needs picture. Once we have the connection to the movie, I'm sure things will make sense.

    But of course, I don't need to remind people of that.

    --Brian

    [Message edited by Crono/Kyp on 05-16-2008]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-16-2008 11:49 AM PT (US)     

     BigT1981
     Click Here to Email BigT1981
     Standard Userer
     

    Brian,

    A lot of people live in the past and can't accept change or won't. Those people need to get their heads out of their ass and wake up to the present.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-16-2008 12:02 PM PT (US)     

     Jeron
     Click Here to Email Jeron
     Standard Userer
     

    LOL to all of you.

    I've listened to Kingdom of the Crystal Skull several times now, and I like it. I didn't like Irina's theme at first; it felt slow and plodding, un-affecting. But, I thought about it, and if her character plays out the way I think it will, her theme works perfectly as underscore to her lust for and obsession with finding the lost city. The action cues are fine; I personally prefer Last Crusade... much of the action in Crystal Skull feels like Star Wars Ep. 1-3 rehash. I feel like a Republic Commando is going to bust through a window and start firing his blaster at any moment.

    I do really, really like the inversions John is doing on Indy's theme, and how it dances around the melody, particularly toward the end of the Finale cue. I however can't stand the Jungle Chase track. It woulda been awesome, but it ruins itself at 1:54 with a horribly disruptive brass edit that's really louder than it should be. Takes me out of the piece entirely. It almost makes it intolerable.

    Anyway, can't wait to hear it in the film and associate it with what I'm hoping will be an exciting, refreshing trip down nostalgia lane. I'm not looking for "the new Indiana Jones" -- I'm looking for the Indy that kicked ass in the first three films. I was hoping Williams would tap into that as well. Composers evolve, and that's fine - I think he probably did the best job he could. This score doesn't trump Raiders or Last Crusade, and I dare say I might even prefer Temple of Doom over it. But, we'll see. The film could (and hopefully will) alter my impressions.

    [Message edited by Jeron on 05-16-2008]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-16-2008 12:29 PM PT (US)     

     PeterK
     Click Here to Email PeterK
     FishChip
     

    Everyone's pre-orders are now shipping, thanks for the orders. MM price will head back to $15.99 starting soon.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-16-2008 02:51 PM PT (US)     

     tjguitar
     Click Here to Email tjguitar
     Standard Userer
     

    nice! can't wait

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-16-2008 03:20 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    The good:
    - 'Call of the Crystal' takes me back to the eerie synthetic tone colours of THE FURY. Very nicely scored. Reminds me a little of HOLLOW MAN / BASIC INSTINCT themes only in its most basic form.
    - 'Irina's theme' has a nice quality to it, and it's incorporation throughout the score is another consistent pleasure.
    - The second half of 'Jungle Chase' has a touch of the Prokofiev march glory that TEMPLE OF DOOM basked in... also the 'Flag Parade' cue from PHANTOM MENACE.
    - I think he's using the cimbalom again? (Which he used for the darker hues it can produce in MUNICH.)
    - I love the textures and mood of 'Grave Robbers'. It may seem like an unlikely standout, but I sat up and took notice on first listen.
    - 'Ants' seems to be the best action cue for me.
    - The last two pre-finale score tracks - 'Temple Ruins' and 'The Departure' - are top stuff.

    The interesting:
    - 'Adventures of Mutt' as Korngold homage. Not sure if I absolutely like the piece - I suspect it's hitting too much action to play entirely to my satisfaction without seeing the film.
    - The final twist on the Indy theme in the End Credits is nice.

    The 'scores-points-because-it's-a-homage':
    - Good to hear the Ark theme and a Nazi motif in quick succession. Are former Nazis working on the Ark in Area 51 in postwar America?

    The 'temp-track-rides-again':
    - 'City of Gold' - you can tell it's Spielberg and not Lucas driving this bit of temp track trickery. Had it been Lucas, instead of writing a new cue that lifted heavily from an old one, the old cue from WAR OF THE WORLDS would have just been tracked in, and when it no longer fit the picture, and ugly music edit would have led to something else tracked in.

    The Bad:
    - Some people may have been excited to hear large swaths of the ROTS soundtrack album devoted to quotations of previous works in the STAR WARS series. I found it annoying to hear Leia's theme, the Throne Room, and a particular rendition of Vader's theme lifted. Here I find the opening suite feels the same - that suite has been recorded many times, and will be heard again in the end credits (which should have drawn on the 'Call of the Crystal' instead of Marion's theme).

    The disappointing (to me):
    - 'Jungle Chase I' - I think the second half of this cue is quite fine, but the first half feels a bit unstructured.
    - Perhaps a lot of the action music on the whole never quite succeeds in the long form that it could have. (Unfortunately cues like 'General Grievous', 'The Ferry Scene' and others from Williams in recent years have set a very high precedent.)

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-17-2008 09:02 AM PT (US)     

     Quill
     Standard Userer
     

    Hey SpoilerOrange...do you have difficulty with your attention span?? Look at my post again and read what follows the "..."

    And why is it bad form for someone to post a honest assessment of a score? Has the ground that Williams trods on truly become that hallowed?

    I am excited as hell for this movie and score, and I will stand by my opinion that Williams does not inspire as he used to. That is not dwelling in the past, it is merely my opinion that his current output is not merely different...it is simply not of the same caliber. Chew away.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-17-2008 11:54 AM PT (US)     

     Scott
     Click Here to Email Scott
     Standard Userer
     

    In the beginning, during the Star Wars franzy, critics abounded, saying that Williams' score was too simplistic.
    Now, after some time, his style has changed, and now the scores are too complicated, over-orchestrated or just not like they used to be.
    Very interesting indeed.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-17-2008 04:15 PM PT (US)     

     gkgyver
     Click Here to Email gkgyver
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    Has the ground that Williams trods on truly become that hallowed?

    Considering the output of other composers, yes.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-17-2008 05:53 PM PT (US)     

     kindle
     Non-Standard Userer
     

    I thought Williams' scores for the first three Harry Potter films were great (especially Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkeban). I also very much like his work on the Star Wars prequels, so I don't think Williams has lost his touch. It is interesting, though, what a different filmmaker Speilberg has become over the years, and Williams, being Speilberg's exclusive composer, has adjusted his style to fit with the director's evolving attitude toward filmmaking. (Just my perception--feel free to agree with or hiss at me for that one).

    I am very interested to hear Williams' score for KOTCS. 30-second sound clips don't do it justice. I'm expecting a return to the glory days when Speilberg was more daring and willing to tell pure story, rather than the more self-conscious director he has become in the last few years (that is not to say he makes bad movies, though). Hopefully, Williams, too, will recapture the classic Indy sound and pure joy of storytelling that was so inherent in a Williams'-scored Speilberg movie.

    I think I'm really rambling. Sorry.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-18-2008 03:20 PM PT (US)     

     Camillu
     Click Here to Email Camillu
     Standard Userer
     

    http://www.variety.com/VE1117937176.html

    Todd McCarthy at Variety gives Williams a (positive) mention at the end of his review

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-18-2008 04:21 PM PT (US)     

     Jeron
     Click Here to Email Jeron
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Camillu:
    http://www.variety.com/VE1117937176.html

    Todd McCarthy at Variety gives Williams a (positive) mention at the end of his review


    Not having seen the film, that's a great review. Definitely looking forward to the film now.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-19-2008 01:40 PM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    I'm just hoping it's better than The Last Crusade . . . so far it seems so.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-19-2008 06:40 PM PT (US)     

     Jeron
     Click Here to Email Jeron
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by nuts_score:
    I'm just hoping it's better than The Last Crusade . . . so far it seems so.

    Not if you read IGN Movies... ::sigh::

    quote:
    After more than a year of hoping and praying that Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull would do right by fans of the archaeological franchise, the film's first screening in Cannes confirms the worst. There's a brilliant Indy film buried somewhere within, but Star Wars syndrome has struck and Steven Spielberg and George Lucas just couldn't resist dipping into their box of computer-generated magic.

    I'm still excited about the movie. But seriously, the golden age is over. The time where Spielberg, Lucas, Zemeckis, or Cameron can put out a film and it be instantly hailed as a classic... those times are through. Instead, we get rants from brilliant director Uwe Boll, who's delusional enough to think he's some sort of Roman Polanski:

    quote:
    To all of you writing now about me and the fact that POSTAL is not getting screens.

    its okay ..its fun kicking a guy nonstop who is on the ground

    you are all not getting it that i'm the guy who made it against the big hollywood system and you are all only busy to destroy me and finish me up
    and then you YOU WON WHAT ? the attention of the studios, michael bay .. ?????
    if you damage me you feel closer to Hollywood ? what is your game plan?

    you want only movies like JUMPER , SPEED RACER , WHAT HAPPENDS IN VEGAS ...? then keep going and your dreams will be fullfilled. POSTAL makes some very important points ..but you dont wanna see that .... : that Bush used the SEPTEMBER 11 to start a war against a country what had nothing to do with Bin Laden etc.... but this all doesnt matter because you are all busy to THINK that INDIANA JONES or NARNIA are important movies ... but in real they are empty shells of an industry what wants to make money and what wants to keep you looking "escape movies" with nothing in it. in between they are putting some CONTROVERSIAL movies to show that they can do also IMPORTANT movies ...but also this movies are not really critical....they only supporting the system and not showing the big picture. and POSTAL shows the BIG PICTURE ...it nails the absurd situation with all the stupid religions, races and nations we are living in. POSTAL is not accepting bullshit politics. POSTAL has not the opinion that Bush made mistakes - POSTAL has the opinion that it is a scandal that BUSH is not in jail. What happened in America in the last 7 years is the biggest joke since Columbus stepped on that land.

    but instead of seeing the courage i had in doing that movie against everybody who tried to stop me - you are sitting on your desks and you are working on stories about me ....and my image as the worst director on earth...and you fullfill what your editor wants from you in regards of uwe boll ...or you fullfill what you think makes you a cooler guy in the internet ...and you are not getting it that you are only interested in movies like IRON MAN or HULK or KUNG FU PANDA or the MUMMY 3 because the studios spending 60 mio. $ in advertising to make you interested in NON INTERESTING movies. how many times you wanna keep going in movies only because the TRAILER was so cool and the CGI was so great ?

    thanks for reading this


    Uwe Boll


    God save us.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-20-2008 11:22 AM PT (US)     

     webjedi
     Click Here to Email webjedi
     Standard Userer
     

    Shameless self-promotion... SoundtrackNet has a review up with soundclips... stop on by:
    http://web1.soundtrack.net/albums/database/?id=4874&page=review

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-20-2008 11:43 AM PT (US)     

     BackToTheFutureFan
     Click Here to Email BackToTheFutureFan
     Standard Userer
     

    This will be a quick post. I loved the score, great stuff in it. I see it to have the same success as The Phantom Menace score, meaning it will really grow on people. But I love it. I don't know if this has been mentioned before but did anyone notice that the three note crystal skull motif is the ark theme...but just reversed?

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-20-2008 12:36 PM PT (US)     

     Jeron
     Click Here to Email Jeron
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by BackToTheFutureFan:
    This will be a quick post. I loved the score, great stuff in it. I see it to have the same success as The Phantom Menace score, meaning it will really grow on people. But I love it. I don't know if this has been mentioned before but did anyone notice that the three note crystal skull motif is the ark theme...but just reversed?

    Yeah, you're right BTTF... it is an exact reversal of the motif. Craziness. So, if the crystal skull is an alien artifact with extraterrestrial powers, I wonder if they are somehow tying that into the Ark? That'd be awfully Stargate of Spielberg and Lucas. Ark of Truth anyone? So, is the Ark of the Covenant an advanced piece of alien technology?

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-20-2008 12:45 PM PT (US)     

     BackToTheFutureFan
     Click Here to Email BackToTheFutureFan
     Standard Userer
     

    Also, did anyone notice at about 0:46 through "The Departure" we get the same rendition of the Raiders March we got when Indy picks up his whip for the first time in the lion car of the train in The Last Crusade? This kind of scares me. Shia? Damn, I hope not.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-20-2008 03:09 PM PT (US)     

     Jeron
     Click Here to Email Jeron
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by BackToTheFutureFan:
    Also, did anyone notice at about 0:46 through "The Departure" we get the same rendition of the Raiders March we got when Indy picks up his whip for the first time in the lion car of the train in The Last Crusade? This kind of scares me. Shia? Damn, I hope not.

    From what I know... this is a likely direction...

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-20-2008 03:23 PM PT (US)     

     Jeron
     Click Here to Email Jeron
     Standard Userer
     

    Just got back from seeing it. Way over-the-top and ridiculous, but in a really good way. The movie was all kinds of great. It's not the end-all-be-all Indiana Jones movie, but it definitely hits the likeable meter somewhere between Raiders and Last Crusade. It's better than Temple of Doom, for sure. All in all it fits well on the shelf with the others.

    So tempted to say a lot of things, but I don't want to spoil it. A lot of you already have an inkling of where Steven and George are gonna take it. How they take it there is a little different than what I expected, which made it better for me. Thank God they didn't turn Indiana Jones into Daniel Jackson. I don't think I could have handled that.

    Also, regarding the score... DAMMIT. THEY DID IT AGAIN. So much great music, even thematic references to The Holy Grail theme from Last Crusade. And the Jungle Chase. Arghhhh! The album version is totally edited and trimmed down to a mere whisper of what it actually is. Sucks monkey balls. I'd love to have an expanded version of this score; there's a ton of great material that simply didn't make it onto the disc. That said, I enjoy the score a lot more now than I did having not seen it *surprise, I know*.

    Anyway, the movie is out and the polls are running! What did you think? I'm gonna give it the weekend and then all bets are off; if you haven't seen it by Monday, just don't read any of my posts, as I'll be no-holds-barred about spoilers.

    Off you go!

    Jeron

    [Message edited by Jeron on 05-22-2008]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-22-2008 01:57 PM PT (US)     

     Gae
     Click Here to Email Gae
     Standard Userer
     

    OK, I went to see this today and thought I would post some basic impressions of the movie. It will be brief and there wont be any spoilers for those who have yet to see it.

    Indiana Jones and the Kingom of the Crystal Skull was a mixture of both nostalgic fun and frustration for me. Spielberg has made a valiant attempt to re-visit the 80's style of the earlier films while imbuing it with more modern qualities. Overall though, for me, the film wasn't totally successful even if it did deliver most of what you would expect from the Franchise. Apparently, Spielberg spent years and years developing and re-writing the screenplay until he was happy with it but I find this hard to believe as the story doesn't seem that complex at all and follows the same basic narrative structure of "Raiders of the Lost Ark". There have been some complaints though, that the "exposition" is way to long and drags in places so maybe Spielberg did try a bit too hard trying to set up the motivation for the action of the second half of the movie.
    Harrison Ford is pretty good but if I'm honest, he is looking a bit too old to play the part now. I think it may have been a good idea if they had dyed some of the grey out of his hair in an attempt to make him look 10 years younger and more convincing in the role. Ford still makes a pretty valiant attempt at re-treading his most famous role though and certainly throws himself (literally) into the part.
    The film has interesting, of not entirely original premise, plenty of fun and action along the way and the film sticks quite close to the formula of the originals..e.g plenty of live stunts and minimal CGI. There was an element of the film feeling a bit forced and tired at times with a lot of the action seemingly thrown in just for the hell of it and at times I felt myself asking "how many moments of peril can a person survive?".

    Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull *** out of *****

    Gae

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-22-2008 05:24 PM PT (US)     

     Scott
     Click Here to Email Scott
     Standard Userer
     

    Saw the movie.
    I agree with Jeron, way too much music was left out of the album.
    I need to see the film again, since I was very tired going in (Midnight showing) after a brutal finals and minimal sleep, plus a stomach ulcer acting up like there was no tomorrow.
    Ehm, I don't like Shilo LaBuffet too much...I leave it as that.
    The one scene with Shilo LaBuffet...urgh...ok, I wait till everyone seen it, but it did kinda piss me off. LOL!

    NP: Of course...Indy and that Skull thingie

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-22-2008 09:02 PM PT (US)     
     

    Old Infopop Software by UBB

    © 1998-2011, The MovieMusic Company