-
Message Boards

Just Movies!
Anybody going to buy "SW: Episode 1?" (Page 2)
Archive of old forum. No more postings.
Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.
This topic is 3 pages long: 1 2 3Author
Topic: Anybody going to buy "SW: Episode 1?"

SPOR2
unregistered
In one word: NO!
posted 04-04-2000 08:19 PM PT (US) 
Wedge

Standard Userer

Oh, Lancelot, don't be such a sourpuss! Sure, not every entry into the Star Wars literary canon has been a gem ... but as a franchise, it's still LEAGUES ahead of the competition (Star Trek, for one, although they're making a good recovery.) It's not like I go into a Star Wars novel expecting Milton or Melville or Adams. I go in expecting good, quality fun with familiar characters. That's exactly what I get. It gives me something light to enjoy on the weekends (as opposed to, say, 99% of what's on TV.) And once and a while, you get a REALLY good Author in the bargain! (Zahn, Stackpole, Kube-McDowell ...)
posted 04-05-2000 08:09 AM PT (US) 
KyleS
Standard Userer

H Rocco,Clive Revill only provided the voice of the Emperor in TESB. An old woman with make up prosthetics actually played who you see. Also, Baboon eyes were matted on to give the Emperor a creepier stare.
-Kyle
The Phantom Menace is awesome. It perplexes me to hear that others didn't see the pure brilliance of this film. I truly believe that over time, TPM will gain a larger appreciation and understanding of its many complexities.
posted 04-05-2000 08:23 AM PT (US) 
Thor

Standard Userer

AN OLD WOMAN!?!?!? Well, that certainly undermines some of the emperor's power!
posted 04-05-2000 08:50 AM PT (US) 
dantoris

Standard Userer

TRIVIA NOTE: Revill was the voice of Alfred in the very first animated Batman episode, "On Leather Wings," and returned to fill in for Efrem Zimbalist, Jr., in three or four more episodes.
posted 04-05-2000 09:44 AM PT (US) 
Nicolai P. Zwar

Standard Userer

There were some outstanding special effects in THE PHANTOM MENACE (no surprise I guess), and here and there a few neat images and creatures, but dramaturgically the movie was a heartless, lifeless mess. Sorry, I don't wish to be a partry pooper, which is why I'm ending here before I start a rant, but I can't help but wonder: what was Lucas thinking when he shot this giant pc-game clip?
posted 04-05-2000 10:18 AM PT (US) 
Wedge

Standard Userer

Probably, "This will make a GREAT PC game."
posted 04-05-2000 12:35 PM PT (US) 
Marian Schedenig

Standard Userer

Ian McDiarmid is a fantastic actor! But I only saw him in the two "Star Wars" episodes and "Sleepy Hollow", and according to the IMDb, he didn't do too many movies so far.
Nicolai: I'm curious. Are you referring to the "obvious" Darth Maul mini-plot? Or to the subtle "Palpatine's Rise to Power" story? Because I find the latter one very intriguing, and that's what, for me, makes the movie really amazing.
posted 04-05-2000 01:34 PM PT (US) 
Mark Olivarez

Standard Userer

I thought I read somewhere at one time that the Emporer in TESB was voiced by Clive Revill, but Alec Guiness played the physical part. If you look close he bears a remarkable resemblance, minus the beard, at least I think. Anyone have more info?
posted 04-05-2000 04:45 PM PT (US) 
robin4

Standard Userer

Well, I am.
posted 04-05-2000 05:18 PM PT (US) 
Timmer

Standard Userer

Buy this rubbish......Your joking aintcha!!
posted 04-05-2000 05:30 PM PT (US) 
Chris Kinsinger

Standard Userer

Well, I watched the VHS rental of "TPM" last night, and as much as I have tried to like this movie, I just don't. I truly wanted to love it when I saw it in the theatre, but found it to be an incredible visual experience suffocated by a dramatic vacuum.
Upon second viewing, I gained a deeper appreciation for the rhythm of the editing in the battle sequences, the wonderful artistic realization of the alien cities, and the overall visual beauty of the film. But what once again stuck out like a sore thumb was the poor quality of the writing, the total lack of character development, and Lucas's almost complete disinterest in his actors. The battle droids have more interesting physical business than any of the PEOPLE in this movie. It's as I said the first time; "TPM" is the most ambitious cartoon in the history of the cinema.
I'll hang in to see the next two installments, because I still feel that George Lucas is a great filmmaker, but for me, "Jedi" and "Phantom Menace" are vapid dramas pumped up by incredible production values.
If only George could recapture the edge he had with "American Graffiti"...
posted 04-05-2000 06:01 PM PT (US) 
H Rocco
Standard Userer

I completely agree that Lucas seems utterly disinterested in his actors, and even seems to enjoy miscasting them in THE PHANTOM MENACE -- that wretched Jake Lloyd as Anakin (and Haley Joel Osment was up for the same part!!!) Liam Neeson looked even unhappier than he did in THE HAUNTING, which by far is the more obvious waste of time and talent. Ewan McGregor did a superlative Alec Guinness, but also seemed to be more "into" the picture than Neeson, who radiated misery in nearly every scene (as a screen presence he tends to be kind of heavy going anyway, and I say that even as someone who likes him.) Ian McDiarmid, Pernilla August and (however briefly) Terence Stamp were fine, though. And it's easy to underrate what Ray Park did as Darth Maul, that physical stuff is NOT easy to do (I was surprised to recognize that exact same walk when he did the Headless Horseman in SLEEPY HOLLOW ... I'll be curious to see him in X-MEN.)On the plus side, TPM does contain the knockout pod race, which DID impress me, for concept and rhythm. Yet I had the feeling that Lucas designed the picture almost for that alone. Either that or to make an excuse for still more toys. (Ewoks, anybody?)
NP: PAPILLON ("Survival" is dialing up, I tend to play "Cruel Sea," "Hospital" and "Survival," which run back-to-back on the CD, though not in the film, repeatedly.)
posted 04-05-2000 09:34 PM PT (US) 
dantoris

Standard Userer

The characters are extremely boring and uninteresting. Look at the first three: Leia was a Princess, but didn't hesitate to fight back (well, Amidala fought back during the final battle, but she was already a weak character to begin with); Han Solo and Chewie were smugglers and outlaws - they were CRIMINALS; Lando was a traitor to his friends.Qui-Gon should've been a rogue Jedi, one who uses the Dark and the Light Side of the Force, depending on what the situation is. Perhaps Jar-Jar should've been an outcast because he had killed a fellow . . . whatever species he was, not for being a clutz. (C'mon!!) Obi-Wan should've been more of a rebel type, a hot-shot, who eventually learns from his mistakes and risk-taking.
This would've made (at least the characters) much more interesting in The Phantom Menace. The only thing servicable from this film was John Williams' score ("Duel of the Fates" was the best piece), but it's far from being one of his best.
NP: Clear and Present Danger - "The Ambush" ***/*****
[This message has been edited by dantoris (edited 05 April 2000).]
posted 04-05-2000 10:17 PM PT (US) 
H Rocco
Standard Userer

Well, you put your finger right on it. I didn't care a whit for any of the characters in THE PHANTOM MENACE, except for Obi-Wan because I knew the guy, kind of, and I wanted to like Qui-Gon more than I did. Never mind Jar-Jar. The only moving or interesting character, to my mind, was Anakin's mom.And it was WAY too obvious about that dual-identity thing going on with Queen Amidala and her "handmaiden" (although in fairness, I failed to recognize Sofia Coppola!) And you're right again, dantoris, Leia was an infinitely feisty and fun character who kept us interested -- too many female characters in action films are just baggage -- as I felt Leia HAD become by the time of JEDI, though of course Ms. Fisher's substance abuse problems at the time didn't contribute to her overall screen presence. Watching her mother Debbie Reynolds in MOTHER (1996) and STAR WARS close together, I was fascinated to see how many of her mom's tics Carrie Fisher was imitating in the first two ... by the time of JEDI she sounds like what she was for a little while, a strung-out Valley Girl. Well, she's gotten it back together now, and good for her.
There's a hateful but fascinating biography out about Lucas right now, called "Mythmaker," that underlines over and over again how much Lucas wishes he could just dispose with the actors entirely. I think a lot of that is true, and yet if you look at AMERICAN GRAFFITI and STAR WARS, the acting is terrific (I really mean that!) I don't exactly recommend "Mythmaker," especially since its author has such a manifest axe to grind, and yet it is a more vivid and, maybe, perceptive portrait than the earlier one (title forgotten; Lucas shrugs them both off.)
NP: JFK (John Williams) ("Arlington," version on Silva's "Close Encounters: The Essential John Williams" -- not as good as the OST but I am too lazy to flip it)
posted 04-05-2000 10:27 PM PT (US) 
dantoris

Standard Userer

I saw Lucas interviewed, talking about how Neeson and McGregor's faces were digitally placed over their stunt doubles during the lightsabre battle with Maul, and he pretty much summed it up by saying: "In the end, all I needed was the right face."So, stuntmen and CGI can do everything. Just bring an actor/actress in for an hour, scan their face, send them on their way, and you don't even have to worry about "dialogue" or acting.
NP: see above - "Deleting the Evidence"
posted 04-05-2000 10:34 PM PT (US) 
Shaun Rutherford

Standard Userer

If only George could recapture the edge he had with "American Graffiti"...Chris,
I cry myself to sleep every night, repeating your above text in Latin. If only....indeed.Shaun
posted 04-06-2000 12:29 AM PT (US) 
Thor

Standard Userer

Ray Parks was the horseman (in the headless sequences) in SLEEPY HOLLOW? And me who patted myself on the back, sensing a recognition of Walken's determinate moves in this character. Oh, well...
posted 04-06-2000 03:48 AM PT (US) 
Bel366

Standard Userer

Well, I did pick up the widescreen "collector's edition" (Best Buy has it for $28.97). A couple of things occured to me while watching.1. Jake Lloyd can't act if his life depended on it (and this kid is Orson Scott Card's personal pick to play Ender Wiggin).
2. Either the framing wasn't quite right or my tv just isn't wide enough (one of Watto's subtitles start out with the word "etter").
3. John Williams is almost single-handedly responsible for any emotion in that film (when Annakin leaves home and from the point that Darth Maul enters the hangar, for example).
posted 04-06-2000 07:30 AM PT (US) 
Chris Kinsinger

Standard Userer

I'm not ready to lay blame at Jake Lloyd's feet for an uneven performance. George Lucas knows better, and my guess is that he wasn't interested in drawing more out of his child actor. Listen again to the kind of dialogue he wrote for Lloyd...it's painfully obvious.
There are many points where the script flaws smacked me in the face; the most outrageous one being when Shmi confesses to her version of a "divine conception", and Qui-Gon never once questions it. YEAH I KNOW, he's a Jedi, and had an inner-knowing...so why does he fall short in every other area? The script and the finished film simply lack any real character development. No drama. Just lotza plot & special effects.ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz.z.z.z...
I hope the next one is more interesting.
posted 04-06-2000 08:14 AM PT (US) 
Gae

Standard Userer

I have already bought and watched the movie and its true, the movie improves with each viewing. I think expectations were so high that no movie on earth could have lived up to that. I am disappointed that it wasn't released on DVD with loads of extras, that is a suprise. I know a lot of people have said that some of the characters e.g. Jar Jar were irritating and it made me think about the first time I saw Star Wars 23 years ago. I remember that C3P0 and R2D2 were irritating because at the time their characters were very different from anything I'd seen before. After further viewings I got to love the characters and there uniqueness. I think Phantom Menace suffers from some "lacklustre" and uninspired performances (e.g. Neeson) and maybe an overly complicated "political" theme but there is enough of the familiar Star Wars "Universe" to keep the true fan interested and the "effects" are incredible. I also think after a few more viewings the true "quality" of this movie will become apparent and more will be gained with each new viewing. Gae NP Sleepy Hollow
posted 04-06-2000 03:04 PM PT (US) 
SPOR2
unregistered
Caught it again on video the other night: what a mess. Aimless plot; leaden perfomances; Williams's non-stop, blase score; Amadala's non-stop costume changes; purile humour one moment, deathly dull pendatics the next; CGI characters that recall the worst racial stereotypes; action set pieces that fail to ignite the least interest (playing Pod Racer on N64 was more engaging). It's a 2hr toy commercial for goodness sakes! And since I don't buy any of that Made in China crap, why would I buy the video.
posted 04-06-2000 03:25 PM PT (US) 
dantoris

Standard Userer

These characters are unique? What's so unqiue about them? Like I said above, they're all just little-goodie-two-shoes with no interesting characteristics whatsoever.NP: Predator - "Preparing Camp Attack" *****/*****
posted 04-06-2000 03:26 PM PT (US) 
Timmer

Standard Userer

Chris ol'bean,Your H'ness,and dantoris,
You saved me a lot of wrighting space!
You said it all!!p.s. 4 of us went to see this film, and the overwhelming feeling was....NOTHING!!
NP : Fantasia on Thomas Tallis : Vaughan williams
In my oppinion the most beautiful and moving piece of music EVER written!
Thor, your into that Religous feel in music, have you not heard this yet??posted 04-06-2000 05:31 PM PT (US) 
Kevin
Standard Userer

For those of you who bought it (and I won't go into why you wasted your money
), have you seen anything different in the tapes?On the Star Wars newsgroups, there are quite a lot of people complaining that A) the quality of the transfer is terrible, and B) the movie has been edited.
Anyone noticed these things?
Kevin
posted 04-06-2000 09:22 PM PT (US) 
Bryan T
Standard Userer

I thought the transfer was pretty good. Kevin, what do they say has been edited? Just curious; I didn't notice anything.
posted 04-06-2000 09:33 PM PT (US) 
Superman

Non-Standard Userer

On VHS, NOOOOOOOOO...
On DVD, most definately YES !!!! (eventually)
posted 04-07-2000 02:43 AM PT (US) 
Bel366

Standard Userer

I thought that the transfer was pretty good as well. Then again, I do not have a royally suped-up home entertainment center.As to the "editing," I didn't notice anything missing.
posted 04-07-2000 04:22 AM PT (US) 
Dan Brecher

Standard Userer

quote:
Either the framing wasn't quite right or my tv just isn't wide enough (one of Watto's subtitles start out with the word "etter")That is caled 'Overscan'. It is a fault of the tv set. It's common. Some TVs you can re-adjust in the menu.
Dang, am I the ONLY one getting the laserdisc? Sheesh!
Dan (UK)PS: Edited? Rubbish. It's identical to the theatrical cut.
[This message has been edited by Dan Brecher (edited 07 April 2000).]
posted 04-07-2000 04:46 AM PT (US) 
debi
Standard Userer

I have the music, because, well, it's John Williams, what else needs saying? But the video, no interest.This reminds me--a letter in FSM about John Williams' score for Phantom Menace noted: "I was never exactly sure who the main character of The Phantom Menace was supposed to be. So maybe John Williams had the same problem." Bingo! The biggest, most shocking flaw in a story structure riddled with them: whose story is this? Anakin? Qui-Gon? It's not clear. What I DID find interesting was that Williams, at least, understood whose story it SHOULD have been--Anakin's. Anakin's theme with its insistent recollection of Vader's, coupled with the score's centerpiece, Duel of the Fates--the literal battle for Anakin's soul. If the story began with Anakin, if it unfolded from his POV--it begins to have a spine. As it is, TPM is no one's story & so lacks dramatic tension (and audience identification). If people didn't react well to TPM, this is one very big reason.
Course, they would have had to cast Osment (who auditioned for the role), because Jake could NOT have handled it.
Good thing Wedge can't hear me...:-)
posted 04-07-2000 08:16 AM PT (US) 
Andre Lux
unregistered
You guys bashing "Episode 1" are quite funny. The movie has some flaws - like Jar Jar geting so anoying at the begining - but it was a fine fantasy movie. And feature some very cool moments.Lucas' direction was indeed bad, but the same happened in "A New Hope". I love to see Mark Hammil and Harrison Ford looking straigh to the camera all the time. Not to mention Darth Vader shaking his menacing finger while you can't hear his voice...
The truth is just one: you guys got old...

The first "Star Wars" got the same kind of criticism you are presenting here by "critics" all around - just a little less since the Internet didn't exist at that time.
And for the teens who didn't like the movie. Well, some of them are saying "End of Days" was better... Say no more!!!
Bye, bye...
HOW RUDE!!!
[This message has been edited by Andre Lux (edited 07 April 2000).]
posted 04-07-2000 09:33 AM PT (US) 
mlw
Standard Userer

I still like it very much. Compared to star wars 1977 it's about the same, goofy if not flat out idiotic dialog, disposable acting (Jar Jar or Mark Hamill, what's the difference? Carrie Fisher? huh?), child-like sense of story and continuity, no traditional protagonist (77 was supposed to be about Luke? Who told you that?-- Empire scattered it's interests about as well but no one has the balls to admit because it's a superior job of direction), actually Neeson does a terrific job rooting to the Samurai spirit better than Guiness did-- Guiness now just looks bored and ready to get paid and exit as quickly as possible. Same archetype on the sleeve toploaded desire to make everything conform to some intellectual idea of Myth (for those who need somebody like Joseph Campbell to point out the academic textbook definition) without signalling any real understanding of myth from within, you know, unconscious and FELT. The 1977 version has "the edge" (LOL) in actual photographed sets and a little more desire to please the studio than Lucas displays now. Otherwise they're all the same ****ing movie, get over it. I think a lot of people are mostly fooling themselves. The attempt to coopt asiatic style in Phantom Menace is commendable for the designs, the non-Western approach to narrative (we don't need another hero!), Nick Gilliard and Ray Park's Martial choreography which puts this a notch above all the other star wars flics. This movie branched into areas mainstream flics aren't supposed to, the positive things are exhilarating enough to overtake the lame ones. So Lucas' autism doesn't extend past his private interests, what did you expect? Everyone acts like their cult leader is exposed or something. Good. Now they can move on to cool sh-- for a change!
posted 04-07-2000 10:16 AM PT (US) 
Dan Brecher

Standard Userer

quote:
Not to mention Darth Vader shaking his
menacing finger while you can't hear his voice...That's a simple editing boob they made due to problems in cutting that scene short and still having to sync up dialogue. Look at the first scene inside the Skywalker hovel in Phantom Menace for the EXACT same problem, this time with Amidala. Keep you eyes on Natalie Portman. She appears to be intoduing herself and R2 to Shimi, but wait, she makes no sound!

I think Jake Lloyd was fine myself. Yikes c'mon, he's a 9 year old kid! He played a 9 year old kid damn well too if you ask me!
All I would have damanded be removed is the Eopie on tatooine at the flag parade farting and Jar Jar going "pee-yosa" in responce. To resort to a fart gag is the lowest of the low. The fart sound effect is sound loud too it muffles the end of the 'Flag Parade' cue. Arghhh!
I think Jar Jar would have been mroe loved had a lot more of his original dialogue remaind. In one draft he asks Amidala what death is, and wow, I LOVE that scene as it is written. I mean ok, I love Jar Jar anyway, but I think that scene would have been a nice addition, maybe even won over a few more fans for the funny guy.
Lucas was odd in his dialogue editing descisions. Anakin before the council on the page is a great scene, he even goes as far as saying to Yoda "I'm not afraid!" (hey, doesn't Luke say that to Yoda in Empire?). The script is worth reading, but boy do I find myself loving this movie even more upon repeat viewings. It's great harmless fun!
Dan (UK)
NP: Galaxy Quest Promo (****/*****)
[This message has been edited by Dan Brecher (edited 07 April 2000).]
posted 04-07-2000 10:30 AM PT (US) 
dantoris

Standard Userer

Jake Lloyd looked like he was forcing himself to "act." You wanna see a 9 year old kid act like a 9 year old kid? Take a look at Danielle Harris in Halloween 4 and especially Halloween 5. Much better performance. Course, she was in two much better films, so she had reason to deliver an amazing performance.NP: Tour of Duty - "End Title" (.wav file)
posted 04-07-2000 11:40 AM PT (US) 
dantoris

Standard Userer

And you know Lucas has lost it all when there's a fart joke in a Star Wars.
posted 04-07-2000 12:07 PM PT (US) 
Andre Lux
unregistered
I agree that Jake Loyd's performance wasn't the best of all times (he really looked like a 9 years old bad actor), but at least he was better than Arnold Sxhwartzkapov on that incredible laughable movie called "End of Days".Ok, ok! I know this is no eulogy...
[This message has been edited by Andre Lux (edited 07 April 2000).]
posted 04-07-2000 12:22 PM PT (US) 
Andre Lux
unregistered
CONFIRMED: After the fiasco of his last movie, muscled actor Arnold Schwartzkapovf begs for a role in "Star Wars - Episode 2"
Arnold: THERE WILL BE NO FARTS ON THIS ONE!!
posted 04-07-2000 12:44 PM PT (US) 
Ron Pulliam
Standard Userer

Got the special collector's edition in the mail yesterday!It's wonderful! I loved the movie (last night was the first time I had seen it).
The score in the film is sensational....it should have been fully released on CD.
I honestly didn't think it was going to be too much based on everything I've read about it on the internet....but it was damned entertaining, vibrant and satisfying.
Jar Jar is annoying, I agree. And all the hoopla about CGI-created creatures doesn't really translate to "real-looking" creatures to me.
The scale was awesome, as were the special effects.
I didn't want to wait until 2006 to see if Lucas would then release the first trilogy on DVD. Who knows what might happen between now and then?
Ron
posted 04-07-2000 12:58 PM PT (US) 
debi
Standard Userer

I really, really dislike the "if you didn't like it, it's because you're comparing" argument. As if the story structure couldn't POSSIBLY be to blame. What I demand of any movie, no matter WHAT the genre, is a good story--which consists of protagonist, antagonist & compelling goal, clearly defined. Characterization is nice, and stellar acting is a big plus, but when you do at least those three BASIC things right, you'll hook the audience, guaranteed.Was A New Hope in any danger of winning an Oscar? Did it have stellar characterization & acting? Did it have depth? God no!! But did Lucas at least get the basic Writing 101 story elements right? Yes, he did. A New Hope IS told from Luke's point of view, poll the audience on who was the main character. Is Vader a stereotypical villain? You betcha! But he works, because he's THERE and participating in the action. Darth Maul, blink & you missed him. Palpatine didn't physically participate. So, no real hero, no real villain, and the goal was lemme see now, end the trade war. Oh golly, that's exciting.
Oops, there I go comparing two SW movies. Forget that, then. Pick ANY good movie. The Matrix, quick tell me who's the hero, who's the villain, what's the goal & is that goal compelling? The Unforgiven. Fargo.
The point is, you can mess with basic story elements that have been around since the Greeks, and been around because they work--but when some people don't react well, THAT'S the reason.
Now, not everyone is into story, and that's okay. But it's important to me, because without it, I'm not involved.
Also, I work in theater & with child actors and I PROMISE you, there are much better child actors out there.
And if I'd have known I was gonna go on that long, I'd have brought a glass of water…
posted 04-07-2000 01:03 PM PT (US) 
dantoris

Standard Userer

It's simple: The Phantom Menace is a movie like The Matrix. It wants to be such a big and impressive epic that it falls flat on it's face because it's TRYING to be great.
posted 04-07-2000 01:37 PM PT (US) Old Infopop Software by UBB
