-
Message Boards

Just Movies!
What Have You Seen in APRIL 2003?
Archive of old forum. No more postings.
Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.
Author
Topic: What Have You Seen in APRIL 2003?

Lou Goldberg

Standard Userer

What the hell, I thought I'd start this topic this month. Now get out there, watch some stuff, and report back.......
posted 04-02-2003 03:02 AM PT (US) 
Kevin
Standard Userer

Since I bought a larger (and newer) television, to replace my 1986 set, I've watched...2001: A Space Odyssey
The Matrix
LOTR: SEHad to try out the bigger screen.

posted 04-03-2003 06:34 PM PT (US) 
Graham Watt

Standard Userer

Aonoch Eagach! What a bout of polyunsaturated monkey disease I'm nursing. Just crawled out my pit to see what's been happening here.Two things since last time (this was actually last month, but I'll post them here at the risk of setting up an anti-matter universe up whose axehole we all disappear.)-
ADAPTATION (USA 2002)
Directed by Spike Jonze
Screenplay by Charlie and Donald Kaufman, from the novel by Susan Orlean
Photography by Lance Acord
Music by Carter BurwellMain Cast: Nicolas Cage, Nicolas Cage, Meryl Streep, Chris Cooper
Mightily impressed. Because of the nature of the film, it is at once a movie in itself and its own "Making Of". I think there's a real fiendish intelligence at work here. Notice the duality of it all! Get to grips with ideas of duality through the representation of false happiness, reality, spontaneity, creativity and writer's block! I thought it was also good how the opposites were not noticeably opposites, but rather mirror images - the most blatant example being Cage's happy, uncomplicated twin. It would have been easy to have him portrayed as a Buddy Love kind of alter ego, but no, there he is cheerfully sharing the same Gene Wilder frizzy see-through orange hair as his tortured brother. I was constantly coming to false conclusions throughout ADAPTATION, but that's okay. Everyone comes away with their own ideas. And my conclusion is that it's difficult to come to a conclusion, but it's a great film (although it gets a bit ordinary near the end).
I liked the score. Burwell catches the tone just right. Precision meets its skew-whiffity alter ego.
posted 04-05-2003 06:58 AM PT (US) 
Graham Watt

Standard Userer

Also saw THE CORE. I don't know how scientific it is, but I get the impression that it... isn't very. Doesn't matter. Only superficially (ho ho) like JOURNEY TO THE CENTRE OF THE EARTH, it actually reminded me a bit more of FANTASTIC VOYAGE, where a sense of awe is transmitted at the amazing beauty of inner space. That, plus the fact that they rarely get out the ship, which in this case makes the action too restricted. Also, the dangers the crew faces, and the idea of them meeting their deaths one by one is just too clichéd. I even got the order of deaths right. And whilst I'm complaining, their journey to the centre of the earth is unattractively dark and murky (though brighter than I imagined it to be underground).A shame, because some of the early scenes are well done. It's always fun to see places like Rome destroyed in true 50s SF style, and there's an extremely good BIRDSish scene of chaos and terror set in London's Trafalgar Square, but the rest of the film peters out in comparison.
The Christopher Young score nods effectively in the direction of Jerry Goldsmith in militaristic mode. It's solid and polished, but overall I felt it was a bit flat and undistinguished.
posted 04-05-2003 07:08 AM PT (US) 
Lou Goldberg

Standard Userer

I went down nostalgia lane and caught Return to the Batcave, a mystery involving Adam West and Burt Ward in the present and people playing them at a younger age as they are involved with making the Batman TV series in the 60s. It was fun, dopey, pointless, and entertaining.Caught a documentary made for French TV with Jean-Pierre Melville made about 2 years before he died. He seemed in good health. Melville had some great stories to tell, no where near as in-depth as the ones he told in his published interview with Rui Nogeira, but the film was really more like hangin' with Melville than analyzing every aspect of every film. The result was surprisingly fun despite what a loner recluse JP was.
I also caught Cowboy Bebop-The Movie. It had a couple of solid scenes but went on too long. The animation was better than the story line. The score, by the usually great Yoko Kanno, was unfortunately mostly rock played at loud levels on the mix--more alienating than helpful.
posted 04-06-2003 08:30 PM PT (US) 
Donovan448

Standard Userer

Actually, I have been disgusted with the new April 2003 movies. The movies do not interest me. Therefore, I have been looking for some movies that I have not seen in years. I saw the remake of "Anna Karenina",which impressed me, and the entire Mini-Series "The Thornbirds." The Thornbirds was not as great as I remembered. I was only twelve years old when I saw it. However, Racheal Ward, an actress, put on a good performance. I only wished that Hollywood would have used her talents more. She did not play in too many films.In the future, I would like to see the Mini-Series "Mussolini: The Untold Story" (1985) but I can not find it anywhere. George C Scott played as Mussolini. Yes, I was young when I saw this movie but I remember it a little better than "The Thornbirds." The movie "Nadia", which I have not seen in years, is also on my list.
Don
posted 04-10-2003 09:57 PM PT (US) 
Lou Goldberg

Standard Userer

Every April, the Banff Mountain Film Festival World Tour arrives in Ann Arbor. The festival takes place in Banff, Alberta every November and the winning films go on tour all over the world. This year's films were good but not as good as last year. One film, however, was amazing--Human Ape--about a mountain climber who uses buildings to climb over. Watching this guy scale drug stores and banks and dormitories and the like right in the middle of crowds and towns was a delight.I showed the last Melville of the retrospective this last Sunday--Le Deuxieme Souffle. This was one of the really good Melvilles, it had some great bits and more humor than any other Melville except Les Enfants Terribles. It has a disjointed feel but doesn't linger the way Bob Le Flambeur could. Although John Woo talks highly of Le Samourai and Le Cercle Rouge, this is the Melville that most resembles a Woo film, right down to the gangsters with guns in each hand.
posted 04-14-2003 12:52 AM PT (US) 
Graham Watt

Standard Userer

A CHUMP AT OXFORD (USA 1940)Directed by Alfred Goulding
Screenplay by Charles Rogers, Harry Langdon and Felix Adler
Photography by Art Lloyd
Music by Marvin HatleyMain Cast: Stan Laurel, Oliver Hardy, James Finlayson, Forrester Harvey, Wilfred Lucas, Peter Cushing
Stan and Ollie find jobs as butler and maid (!) in a posh house, but, unsurprisingly, make a fine mess of it. Their next job sees them as street sweepers. This is much more successful, because they unwittingly catch a bank robber (he slips on their banana skin), and the manager, in gratitude, finances an education for them at Oxford University, where they are the butt of student pranks. Stan gets knocked on the head and and thinks he's the incredibly twittish Lord Paddington for a while. Then he gets knocked on the head again and goes back to being Stan.
Laurel and Hardy were sometimes amazingly funny, but A CHUMP AT OXFORD looks quite weak, nowhere near as inventive as some of their earlier 20-minute shorts - and with the episodic structure it's like three of the (unfunnier) ones strung together. Certainly no classic, and very ramshackle, but it's impossible not to like. Endearing rather than great, although Stan's insults as Lord Paddington are amusing, and I did have fun spotting Peter Cushing, in his first screen appearance, as one of the students.
As was to be expected, the music is like an old crackly LP grinding away in the background, although few of the old tunes associated with the old two-reelers make an appearance. Actually, there does seem to have been an attempt to match the music to the image occasionally, or at least catch the mood of the scene, which suggests that the score was composed to picture, but it hardly matters. Well, it'll never displace from 20th century collective consciousness the indelible memory of "through composed", or merely tracked, Stan and Ollie routines.
posted 04-14-2003 09:33 AM PT (US) 
Graham Watt

Standard Userer

In THE OUTER LIMITS episode "Fun And Games", good-for-nothing crooked schmuck Nick Adams and pregnant, bored idealist Nancy Malone end up on planet Arena, where they must fight for survival against a pair of primitive aliens."Fun And Games" is a problematical episode which seems to accentuate the weaker aspects of the impressive old series. More than ever it looks and sounds like a moral in search of direction, where characters representing opposing ideas are shoe-horned into an extreme situation and forced to mouth unlikely profound dialogue. Not very convincing then, with the added burden of having the annoyingly Pinocchio/Tintin-headed wee nyaff Nick Adams in the lead role. He's irritating to look at, but Nancy Malone's performance is worse, reacting to Adams and monsters alike with the same fed-up countenance.
But I'll never not like OUTER LIMITS.
posted 04-14-2003 09:41 AM PT (US) 
Graham Watt

Standard Userer

I was quite pleased with HEIST, the David Mamet thriller with Gene Hackman and Danny DeVito. It's not the most startlingly original premise for a movie, but the twists and turns are very smartly handled, even when you don't know what's going on.Helping the pace enormously is the excellent music, although it's quite clearly modelled on Goldsmith's L.A CONFIDENTIAL.
HEIST (USA 2001)
Directed by David Mamet
Screenplay by David Mamet
Photography by Robert Elswit
Music by Theodore ShapiroMain Cast: Gene Hackman, Danny DeVito, Delroy Lindo, Sam Rockwell, Rebecca Pidgeon
posted 04-14-2003 09:47 AM PT (US) 
Graham Watt

Standard Userer

SUDDENLY, LAST SUMMER surprised me because it's so close at times to being a horror movie, with Katharine Hepburn in the Vincent Price role, necrophiliously obsessed with a dead family member. Perpetually messed-up looking Monty Clift is dragged in by Hepburn to lobotomize Elizabeth Taylor (who, as the "mad" cousin, seems about the sanest person in the cast). It's a wordy film which didn't quite work for me (and the lengthy revelation looked heavily censored in the version I saw, making it virtually incomprehensible), but it has a lot of interesting detail along the way. Also, it's very well designed and strikingly shot in sharp black and white.Good too is the atmospheric scoring. I recognized Malcolm Arnold's style throughout, though it seems to have been a collaborative effort with Buxton Orr, an interesting composer who had previously done solid scores for some low budget Brit SF/horrors like FIEND WITHOUT A FACE and CORRIDORS OF BLOOD.
SUDDENLY, LAST SUMMER (GB 1959)
Directed by Joseph L. Mankiewicz
Screenplay by Gore Vidal and Tennessee Williams, from the play by Tennessee Williams
Photography by Jack Hildyard
Music by Buxton Orr and Malcolm ArnoldMain Cast: Katharine Hepburn, Elizabeth Taylor, Montgomery Clift
posted 04-14-2003 09:59 AM PT (US) 
LRobHubbard

Standard Userer

Greetings all - thought I'd jump in with a couple, since I actually went to a theatre for the first time in months.DREAMCATCHER
Directed by Lawrence Kasdan
Screenplay by William Goldman and Lawrence KasdanThose who got warned off by the critical pans of this are missing one of the best matinee films out this year. It's not quite at the level of LIFEFORCE, but it's as enjoyable, if not more so.
It's easily one of the better King adaptations put to film and the surprising thing is that both Goldman and Kasdan manage to be pretty faithful to what is one of King's wonkiest books... with the exception of one minor point at the climax (although the logic of it works so well in the context of the film).
Forget the Lawrence Kasdan who did THE BIG CHILL, GRAND CANYON & MUMFORD.... the guy who did this is the Larry Kasdan we all know and love from RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK and BODY HEAT.
WRONG IS RIGHT - a 1982 film by Richard Brooks starring Sean Connery as Patrick Hale, a superstar television news personality who finds himself drawn into a fandango of events involving the U.S. Presidency, a Mid-Eastern country and two suitcase atom bombs. And it's a political satire - although watching it recently, it looks very much like current events in another Mid-East country now. More about this at my blog.
http://mimezine.blogspot.composted 04-14-2003 09:33 PM PT (US) 
JJH

Standard Userer

I watched a bit of some movie on one of those HBO channels about some sex addict, just because there was nothing else on TV.
this was horrible. a train wreck.
Shot on HD, too. Artificial looking, with no depth.and the acting wasn't all that great, either. Nastassja kinska, Roseana Arquette, Ed Begley, Jr. -- moderately famous people, I guess.
I've decided HD is not all that great.
If you have a massive budget like Star Wars and can fill the screen with digital effects, that's one thing. But for "real" PHOTOGRAPHY, you need film.posted 04-15-2003 06:32 AM PT (US) 
Graham Watt

Standard Userer

JJH, what's HD? Is that high definition video or something? I'm not very up on technical matters, but if we're talking about the same thing, then I've seen it put to very good use in at least one film - LUCÍA Y EL SEXO, an interesting movie from the excellent Spanish director Julio Medem. That film used the medium to great effect, and part of its haunting atmosphere came from the strikingly bleached photography.Things have thankfully come a long way since the days of BBC's deadeningly dull video-taped "classic" series, so stultifyingly unatmospheric visually that you could almost smell the aroma of mothballs emanating from the costumes. And that horrible hollow video sound - a visit to Madame Tussaud's was more dramatic.
Tell me if I misunderstood your post, JJH!
posted 04-15-2003 09:37 AM PT (US) 
Graham Watt

Standard Userer

E.T. THE EXTRA-TERRESTRIAL (USA 1982)Directed by Steven Spielberg
Screenplay by Melissa Mathison
Photography by Allen Daviau
Music by John WilliamsMain Cast: Henry Thomas, E.T., Dee Wallace, Peter Coyote, Robert MacNaughton, Drew Barrymore
An extra-terrestrial gets stranded on planet Earth.
This was the first time I'd seen the retouched version, but I won't go into the changes because they've already been well documented and don't affect the overall tone of the film (unlike CE3K). Nor will I show my great intelligence by repeating what others have said about the themes of fatherless children and their premature exposure to death, resurrection and ascension.
No sir, I shan't mention any of that. I only want to say that I feel E.T. may just be the hardest to take of Spielberg's great films, especially if you're old and irritable. Best to just sit back and enjoy - even so, I found myself in disagreement with the "misuse" of E.T. in the film: we see him in drag, we see him drunk, and all with the intention of getting assured laughs from the 5-year olds in the audience. Or maybe it's a simple case of familiarity breeding contempt.
This reaction of mine extends to the score too. The climactic sequence is amongst the most perfect matches of music and image I can recall, but some scenes are perhaps too epically scored for such an intrinsically intimate film.
What an unhappy old grump I am. I actually almost love E.T., both film and score, but I'm too bloody grouchy and miserable to get beyond the "almost".
posted 04-17-2003 01:17 PM PT (US) 
joan hue

Standard Userer

I rented Phillip Noyce’s film Rabbit Proof Fence. Kenneth Branagh plays an
Australian in charge of “taking care” of the Aborigines in the 1930’s because, “They
couldn’t take care of themselves.” The racism is this movie is horrific.Whites built 1500 miles of a fence to keep out the rabbits. They had sex with native
Aborigines who lived near this fence and who bore half caste children. The government
took these children away from their Aborigine mothers and sent them to a camp where
they were trained as domestics for Whites. Also, they will be bred by whites, and over
generations, the theory was that their native blood with be bred out of them. Ugh. Three
girls are taken away to this camp, escape, and walk 1500 miles along the fence to find
their mothers.Gorgeous photography. Lovely landscapes. Horrific story that really holds your attention
at first because it is hard to believe such practices occurred.And yet this story, IMO, was strangely ineffective. It lacked dramatic impact. The girls
were never very believable and registered little emotion. Consequently, I didn’t connect to
them like I did to the characters in ROOTS. I heard nothing of merit in the music and
wondered why it garnered a Golden Globe nomination. Also, it didn’t tackle a very
touchy issue. It showed a white male land owner coming into the domestic’s bedroom
for breeding to a young woman. However, at the camp were many bi-racial boys who
were being trained as domestics, but they didn’t address how their native blood would be
erased through breeding with whites.Overall, I felt the story should have been more compelling and heart-wrenching.
Hey, Graham, I still love E.T., but for some reason the two Harry Potters just don't do a thing for me. I'm bored with them...and I'm not a grump.

posted 04-18-2003 10:17 PM PT (US) 
Kevin
Standard Userer

American Pie
Twister
posted 04-19-2003 07:18 PM PT (US) 
Graham Watt

Standard Userer

Joan, I hereby declare you a nongrump for not liking the Harry Potter films in an ungrumpy way. I grumpily disliked them, or at least one of them, because I was too grumpy to see the second one.I came out rather grumpily from DREAMCATCHER, I must admit. LRob mentions earlier how he liked the film, on the level of a LIFEFORCE, for example. Well, I'm sorry, but I didn't like it, didn't like it at all. I was really hoping for so much more, because, although I've seen through Stephen King for donkey's years, I still held out for Kasdan. But no. I was very disappointed with DREAMCATCHER. I felt that the disparate elements didn't jell at all well - we have the small-town youth portrayal, the special powers aspect, the Cronenberg bodily functions horror (here mere scatological humour), the gung-ho INDEPENDENCE DAY attitude to the aliens, plus Carpenter's version of THE THING etc etc. No, apart from anything (too long, too unfocussed, too pretentious) DREAMCATCHER is just too derivative. And I think that half the problem just might be Stephen King. 600 pages going nowhere slowly. Jack Finney wrote this kind of stuff in 30.
I was rather grumpily unimpressed by the James Newton Howard score. Mostly subdued, but when he's called upon to thrash about he does so, to as little effect as the tail on the mutthafockink alien.
posted 04-20-2003 02:20 PM PT (US) 
Lou Goldberg

Standard Userer

Earler this week I watched Captain Kronos Vampire Hunter on AMC. Pan & scan with commercials and cut too. No great shakes but the score by Laurie Johnson was very good. Even with The Avengers team behind it, it just isn't effective. It's not funny, it's not scary, it's not atmospheric. I don't understand its reputation. The Aryan leading man makes Swartzenegger's acting seem like Olivier's. Caroline Munro can't act either but then with that body and smile she doesn't really have to. Bells in the woods, dead toads turning live, that's all you can give me? There were two good scenes: figuring out how to kill the vampire they have tied to a chair and fighting the 3 guys in the tavern. But there were two equally bad scenes: a gang of townsfolk want to get Kronos, he could avoid the fight by just talking to them, but he kills them all instead while Munro smiles at what a He-man he is, and worse, the finale, with everyone standing under hypnosis while Kronos and the vampire do a fencing routine. As a rule, I usually find something to like in a Hammer film, and this one did pass the time, but given what a great idea the wandering medieval vampire hunter premise is, this could have been better.
posted 04-20-2003 09:03 PM PT (US) 
Lou Goldberg

Standard Userer

Another Hammer film today. Rasputin the Mad Monk with Christopher Lee sporting a tan and lots of hair. This was a lot of fun, watching Lee drink and lust and hypnotize girls into bed or to kill themselves. And the ending was sheer nastiness, with one foul thing poured on top another. Barbara Shelley is wonderful in this as she is in Quatermass and the Pit and Village of the Damned, no great actress but nice to watch. Meanwhile, Lee chews the scenery but it's all in fun. And the score by Don Banks is also great, loud and pumping. This entire film is dedicated to excess though not without the usual puritanical streak. Like DeMille in the US, Hammer in England loved to exploit your senses with blood and sex but then punish the transgressors with moralisms at the end. But the vicarious thrills can't be covered up. Now I'm not calling this any kind of work that would hold up to scrutiny, it's just entertaining in a guilty pleasure sort of way. It actually needed more lusty living than it had. Hammer's sanitary high-key lighting and pace almost turned the thing dull. If Lee hadn't been so enjoyably maniacal in the lead, the film would have floundered.
posted 04-21-2003 08:46 PM PT (US) 
SirT

Standard Userer

Thanks to french cable TV, my selection of last week:"Juliette ou la Clef des Songes"
One of Marcel Carné’s last efforts (1950) to revive " poetic realism", a genre for which he laid the foundations in the thirties. Here, the atmosphere of fantasy and tragedy is too constrained, Georges Neveux substituting for Prevert, with much less success."The Ipcress File"
The triumph of style over substance, and a great supporting cast ; Guy Doleman, Nigel Green, Gordon Jackson. Whatever happened to Sydney J. Furie ?
"This Happy Feeling"
A somewhat frustrating comedy from Blake Edwards. Still there was enough to satisfy the Edwards fan within myself, but just. Bad casting in the main leads doesn’t help, nor does Frank Skinner’s unsubtle attemps at "funny" underscoring. Kudos must go to Estelle Winwood , Alexis Smith …and a lady seagull."Many Rivers to Cross
I was in the proper mood to enjoy this inocuous MGM " Frontier" comedy. Actors cheerfully hamming up all over the place, fast-paced direction from Roy Rowland, and an energetic and zestful score from Cyril J. Mockridge were good enough for me."Maciste in Hell"
Maciste in 17th century Scotland!! Riccardo Freda's inspiration at its best for the Inferno scenes, and an effective monolithic score from Carlo Franci.[Message edited by SirT on 04-22-2003]
posted 04-22-2003 04:58 AM PT (US) 
Lou Goldberg

Standard Userer

Love From A Stranger--1937 Brit film with Basil Rathbone & Ann Harding from an Agatha Christie short story. This might have held more suspense at the time, but seems see-through now. The leads are good, maybe Rathbone is a bit over the top, and the third act is interesting because you want to see how she'll get out of the situation. The film had a score by Benjamin Britten. The early cues didn't seem to relate to what was on screen much, Britten doing his own thing regardless of the image. Later on there were quotes from Grieg.LOTR:The Two Towers--I didn't care for the first of these films very much, but this one was much better constructed. It follows the original group as splintered into smaller units and crosscuts between them and this seemed to work out. There are less fights with big creatures and more conventional medieval warfare. It's Ivanhoe with less sunlight and more extras. Visually, the thing was amazing to look at. Jackson's camera could slow down some, it doesn't have to fly over and surround its protagonists so much as the content of the images is strong enough. The story is less impressive than the look. Just more right wing war stuff when you boil it all down. The scoring was not boring. It was mixed high and I felt it was more effective than the one that won Shore the Oscar.
posted 04-22-2003 09:52 PM PT (US) 
Lou Goldberg

Standard Userer

I sat down with some VHS I picked up off Ebay, in this case, episodes of Lost In Space. I watched The Keeper Pts 1&2, in black and white so I presume it was from the first season. The usual shtik: Dr. Smith trying to make deals to get back to earth, the Robinsons being super-moral and altruistic, alien monsters, etc. This at least had Michael Rennie in it. But there were a lot of plot elements that didn't make sense which can be kind of annoying. I hadn't seen an episode of this show for some years, so it was good to spend sometime on the Jupiter 2 again, but a little dose of this goes a long way. I can't believe someone on the board said they preferred this show to Star Trek!
posted 04-23-2003 08:45 PM PT (US) 
SirT

Standard Userer

GIVE A GIRL A BREAK directed by Stanley Donen.
Modest, inventive and colorful!
posted 04-23-2003 10:42 PM PT (US) 
Graham Watt

Standard Userer

Ah yes Lou, I vaguely remember CAPTAIN KRONOS: VAMPIRE HUNTER. No great shakes, and distinctly unmemorable ('cos I can hardly remember it). This was late period Hammer, when they were trying, and failing, to inject new blood into their productions through gimmicky ideas like the "modern" (actually hilariously dated) DRAC AD 1972 and the comic-book CAPTAIN KRONOS. The Clemens-scripted DOCTOR JEKYLL AND SISTER HYDE was a much better attempt at updating the old myths. But yes, the Laurie Johnson score was good, wasn't it? In CAPTAIN KRONOS he certainly exploits the Herrmann vein to the full. That Herrmann connection goes way back to FIRST MEN IN THE MOON (a great Herrmannesque score), and was very evident in later Johnson works like his sequel scores to Herrmann's own IT'S ALIVE, and in the British video series from the 70s, THRILLER. A curious composer. He could be dark and obsessive, yet suddenly switch to the bright game-show type razzle-dazzle of the AVENGERS theme, the travelogue WHICKER'S WORLD and THIS IS YOUR LIFE.I also just about remember Hammer's RASPUTIN. And to think that some people complained at the time that there was no historical context! Well, of course their wasn't! But I too enjoyed seeing Christopher Lee get the chance to really chew the scenery instead of merely standing around looking threatening or important. And, agreed, great Don Banks score. I covered him in one of my old "From The Vaults" threads.
Sir T asks "What happened to Sidney J Furie?" I just checked his credits, and he's still going strong. 50-plus films under his belt and I've only heard of four of them.
posted 04-25-2003 02:23 PM PT (US) 
Graham Watt

Standard Userer

I always quite liked the idea of being a nun, because that kind of inner peace is supremely attractive. But after THE NUN'S STORY I don't want to be one any more. Apart from not taking men, it's not really about spiritual enlightenment at all. Poor Audrey Hepburn was really in a no-win situation all along. Tortured by self-doubt, unable to enjoy small satisfactions such as the feeling of pride which comes from doing good, it seems that she was continually stymied by the guilt of even recognizing the existence of thoughts which breached the Holy Rule. Bummer.Two and a half hours of this had me fidgety, but I was most impressed, and the restraint shown by all is admirable. The inner turmoil comes across clearly even without the presence of brusque, plain-speaking agnostic Peter Finch (although it was satisfying to see him as a mouthpiece for the ordinary non-nun viewer).
Suitably reverential score by Franz Waxman, a great work indeed, awesomely good music. The religious aspect is spine-tingling, but there are also interesting minor cues such as the plucked strings in the few scenes of violence, and the brooding music for the lepers (poor lepers - what with this and BEN-HUR, they were often treated like monsters by their composers).
THE NUN'S STORY (USA 1959)
Directed by Fred Zinnemann
Screenplay by Robert Anderson, from the book by Kathryn C. Hulme
Photography by Franz Planer
Music by Franz WaxmanMain Cast: Audrey Hepburn, Peter Finch, Edith Evans, Peggy Ashcroft, Dean Jagger
posted 04-25-2003 02:41 PM PT (US) 
SirT

Standard Userer

Reindeer Games
John Frankenheimer's final movie was as much fun as a Donald Westlake novel.At The Earth's Core
Any picture featuring a scantily-clad Caroline Munro can't be bad.posted 04-27-2003 12:56 AM PT (US) 
jonathan_little

Standard Userer

I saw The Transporter this past weekend. Generally, it was a crappy film. The film starts out with a half-decent car chase, but it loses all momentum after that. The fight sequences were laughable. I still have no idea really what the deal of the story was: Why were the characters in this situation? Who were the characters? But anyhow, I don't really care. There were also too many glaring continuity errors.Also, I was very sad to see that the final chase sequence basically just rips off the great truck chase in Raiders of the Lost Ark. Of course, the Raiders chase is vastly superior.
The music throughout is a pile of disjointed crap that does nothing but harm the movie, especially during the chase scenes. Why don't directors just let the sound of the engines roar through the sound mix instead of drowning everything out with horrid music?
Anyhow, it was a decent 87 minutes or so of mindless entertainment, but I have to wonder how films like this get funded.
[Message edited by jonathan_little on 04-27-2003]
posted 04-27-2003 01:00 PM PT (US) 
Graham Watt

Standard Userer

Sir T, I've never read a Donald Westlake novel, but I did like REINDEER GAMES. Frankenheimer had lost his touch well before that, but it was an entertaining, tight movie for me. Want to recommend any Donald Westlake novels?AT THE EARTH'S CORE - Well, I remember that one. Caroline Munro may have looked good in those primitive bras, but even as an undemanding teen ( me, that is, in those days) the movie was a bit embarrassing. Peter Cushing was a brilliant actor, but I was always uncomfortable seeing him go through the dotty grandad routine in this and the DOCTOR WHO movies. And those special effects! Men in plastic suits suspended on wires! Yet in some way they were more endearing than CGI. Just about, though, come to think of it, maybe not.
posted 04-27-2003 03:05 PM PT (US) 
Kevin
Standard Userer

Well, since I've been sick as a dog since last Wednesday (just what are the symtoms of SARS anyways?), so I've been spending time in the basement (more) in front of the television and the DVD player...1941
2010
Galaxy Quest
Gladiator
Maltese Falcon
Monsters, Inc.
Princess Bride
Tornado
Twister[Message edited by Kevin on 04-27-2003]
posted 04-27-2003 03:29 PM PT (US) Old Infopop Software by UBB
